2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29647-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of individual cells from z-stacks of bright-field microscopy images

Abstract: Obtaining single cell data from time-lapse microscopy images is critical for quantitative biology, but bottlenecks in cell identification and segmentation must be overcome. We propose a novel, versatile method that uses machine learning classifiers to identify cell morphologies from z-stack bright-field microscopy images. We show that axial information is enough to successfully classify the pixels of an image, without the need to consider in focus morphological features. This fast, robust method can be used to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MAARs 33 and the MPCS algorithm 32 use correlation analysis. These methods have been further complemented by machine learning 35 , 62 or neural networks 36 . Other methods do not use the pattern itself, but use traditional segmentation on brightfield images: either edge detection 63 or adaptive thresholding 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAARs 33 and the MPCS algorithm 32 use correlation analysis. These methods have been further complemented by machine learning 35 , 62 or neural networks 36 . Other methods do not use the pattern itself, but use traditional segmentation on brightfield images: either edge detection 63 or adaptive thresholding 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the beginning of this project, we explored the alternative of segmenting and labeling each cell individually before classification, but the extremely irregular cellular contours and the occasional overlap among them made this approach inapplicable. We believe the work of Lugagne et al 31 highlights the next steps to overcome these issues. The curated image data was of paramount importance for the achieved performances of the classifiers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…MAARs 33 and the MPCS algorithm 32 use correlation analysis. These methods have been further complemented by machine learning 35,62 or neural networks 36 . Other methods do not use the pattern itself, but use traditional segmentation on brightfield images: either edge detection 63 or adaptive thresholding 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%