2008 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation 2008
DOI: 10.1109/etfa.2008.4638382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of incompatible states in mode switching

Abstract: Mode management is one of the problems in DiscreteEvents Systems control design. Even based on a simple specification, it is very difficult to prove that models of each mode and mutual interaction are correct. This paper demonstrates that Supervisory Control Theory is an effective tool for detecting specification incompatibilities because it clearly separates process, models and specifications. We use simple cases to present a method that introduces flexibility into mode specification. This method can be used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They allow to have the whole view on each mode that can be visited by the system. The present approach is also adapted to the one presented in supervisory control of discrete-event systems discussed in [6], [4]. This model can be used to track component involved in a mode switching.…”
Section: S Witch(k) = S Witch(k) → ∪ S Witch(k) ←mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They allow to have the whole view on each mode that can be visited by the system. The present approach is also adapted to the one presented in supervisory control of discrete-event systems discussed in [6], [4]. This model can be used to track component involved in a mode switching.…”
Section: S Witch(k) = S Witch(k) → ∪ S Witch(k) ←mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…OutS t(k)). The notion of States-out may be understanded as marked states commonly used in theory of control of discret event systems [4], [5]. The States-in may be viewed as initial states of the automaton representing the mode.…”
Section: P = Keyc P(r S) ∪ Keyc P(r S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an usual way in the industry to study and to design independently the mode between them. The models then 1551-3203/$26.00 © 2009 IEEE are extended to include the mode switching [29]. The significant contribution, as presented in this article, is the identification of incompatibility for the mode switching, and the inconsistency (several states are possible to be reached by one commutation, meaning a lost of information) of the specifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si cette dernière est perçue en terme de stabilité pour les systèmes continus et hybrides, il s'agira de cohérence d'états et de conformité de spécifications pour les SED. Les travaux présentés dans (Faraut et al, 2008) répondaient à l'identification de ces incompatibilités et offraient au concepteur une méthode de synthèse de lois de commande conformes à la gestion des modes.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified