2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7318-7_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of In Planta Protein–Protein Interactions Using IP-MS

Abstract: Gene regulation by transcription factors involves complex protein interaction networks, which include chromatin remodeling and modifying proteins as an integral part. Decoding these protein interactions is crucial for our understanding of chromatin-mediated gene regulation. Here, we describe a method for the immunoprecipitation of in planta nuclear protein complexes followed by mass spectrometry (IP-MS) to identify interactions between transcription factors and chromatin remodelers/modifiers in plants. In addi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, affinity enrichment protocols have been updated and further optimized for nuclear, cytoplasmic and membrane-associated protein complexes ( Wendrich et al, 2017 ; Jamge et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Dealing With False-positive and False-negative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, affinity enrichment protocols have been updated and further optimized for nuclear, cytoplasmic and membrane-associated protein complexes ( Wendrich et al, 2017 ; Jamge et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Dealing With False-positive and False-negative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, new studies should focus on searching for other proteins/transcriptional factors that might interact with bHLHs (via heterodimers) and regulate their functions. Approaches such as ChIP-Seq and co-immunoprecipitation, tested in different anther development stages, for instance, would clarify which genes are directly regulated by the aforementioned bHLHs and which proteins make heterodimers with them, respectively ( Jamge et al, 2018 ; Nakato and Sakata, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry analysis (IP‐MS) and co‐immunoprecipitation (Co‐IP) assays were performed as detailed before (Jamge et al ., 2018 ; Jin et al ., 2020 ). Briefly, total proteins, extracted from the derived plant tissues, were centrifuged for 15 min (18 200 g) at 4 °C.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunoprecipitated protein complexes were eluted by boiling the beads for 5 min in 2× SDS‐PAGE sample buffer, which were then separated using 12% SDS‐PAGE. After silver staining (Jamge et al ., 2018 ), the desired protein bands were excised and subjected to LC–MS/MS analysis. For Co‐IP assays, the immunoprecipitated proteins separated by SDS‐PAGE were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, followed by immunoblotting with appropriate antibodies (Table S4 ) (Jin et al ., 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%