2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of important mechanical and acoustic parameters for the sensory quality of cocoa butter alternatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small differences were observed between the different treatments but no general effect of either composition or treatment were observed. This is in agreement with findings in a previous study showing no differences in the sensory perception of the pitch of the sound emission upon breakage of the PSO‐rich fat, the PPO‐rich fat, and the POP‐rich fat .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Small differences were observed between the different treatments but no general effect of either composition or treatment were observed. This is in agreement with findings in a previous study showing no differences in the sensory perception of the pitch of the sound emission upon breakage of the PSO‐rich fat, the PPO‐rich fat, and the POP‐rich fat .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It is generally accepted that the mechanical properties of fats are determined by the SFC and some microstructural factors. As we in a previous study have shown a relative similar SFC of the present fats, the microstructural characteristic was expected to be of great importance for differences in fracturing behavior and acoustic properties .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to identify crispness, many sensory test panels have been still performed and large variations of results have been estimated. Although, sensory test methods are fundamental methods to determine crispness (Christensen & Vickers, 1981;Vickers, 1984), due to the difficulties such as time consuming, not convenient for routine tests, requiring more statistical works and most of all providing participants who have Copyright ©2018 ISEKI-Food Association (IFA) 10.7455/ijfs/7.1.2018.a2 good knowledge in texture attributes, other test techniques; mechanical-acoustical tests and their parameters are applied and evaluated by using some crispy foods which are mechanically brittle and emit sound during consumption (Duizer, 2004;Gregersen et al, 2015;Roudaut, Dacremont, Pamies, Colas, & Le Meste, 2002;Zdunek, Cybulska, Konopacka, & Rutkowski, 2011). Sounds of crispy products during mechanical tests can be detected and evaluated by applying acoustical methods (Edmister & Vickers, 1985;Seymour & Hamann, 1988;Tesch, Normand, & Peleg, 1996;Duizer, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustical analysis of food structure including objective measures of human sensory perception is now a lively topic [2][3][4] [5]. High power applications can be traced back to 1959 [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%