2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2008.00757.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of immune‐responsive genes in the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus infected with the filarial parasite Wuchereria bancrofti

Abstract: Several antimicrobial/parasitic peptides are known to be upregulated in mosquitoes upon infection with parasites. The aim of this study was to identify immune-responsive genes in the vector mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) against the human lymphatic filarial parasite, Wuchereria bancrofti (Cobbold) (Spirurida: Onchocercidae). Suppression subtractive hybridization was performed using RNA from filarial infected and non-infected mosquitoes to obtain differentially expressed transcripts, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…aegypti infected with W. bancrofti [29], but transcriptional responses that occur in these mosquitoes may not represent genes that are used to deter filarial worm infection in an incompatible system, i.e., it is quite possible that differences in gene transcription of mosquitoes in different genera could represent unique strategies for overcoming damage caused by filarial worms and therefore do not represent anti-filarial worm responses. Similarly, identification of immune-responsive genes activated in response to filarial worm infection does not indicate that the mosquito is/has mounted an immune response against the parasites itself [30]. It is possible that the observed response could be an indirect effect caused by the infection, i.e., mf midgut penetration or muscle cell damage that occurs later in development in compatible mosquitoes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…aegypti infected with W. bancrofti [29], but transcriptional responses that occur in these mosquitoes may not represent genes that are used to deter filarial worm infection in an incompatible system, i.e., it is quite possible that differences in gene transcription of mosquitoes in different genera could represent unique strategies for overcoming damage caused by filarial worms and therefore do not represent anti-filarial worm responses. Similarly, identification of immune-responsive genes activated in response to filarial worm infection does not indicate that the mosquito is/has mounted an immune response against the parasites itself [30]. It is possible that the observed response could be an indirect effect caused by the infection, i.e., mf midgut penetration or muscle cell damage that occurs later in development in compatible mosquitoes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Transferrin is a defence molecule which has been shown to be up-regulated in Cx. quinquefasciatus during activation of the immune response [51]. Transferrin is an iron-binding protein involved in iron transport, however in insects it also inhibits the growth of bacteria and other invading organisms by sequestering iron [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…quinquefasciatus , one of the most significant mosquito vectors in the world, is widespread in most parts of southern China with a wide range of distribution. A variety of diseases could be spread, including bancroftian filariasis, West Nile encephalitis, St. Louis encephalitis [ 26 , 27 , 28 ], etc. There is no doubt that these studies were exceedingly necessary for mosquito-borne diseases, but there was a lack of depth exploration of the processes affecting mosquito-pathogen interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%