2018
DOI: 10.1111/myc.12837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Mucorales in patients with proven invasive mucormycosis by polymerase chain reaction in tissue samples

Abstract: Seminested PCR targeting 18S rDNA region of Mucorales is useful for identification of the causative agents of mucormycosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Quantitative PCR in serum 136,137 or tissue 138,139 are available for some species (e.g., Mucor, Rhizopus, Lichtheimia, Rhizomucor) 136,137,[140][141][142][143][144] and may be superior to culture. [145][146][147][148] Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight is another tool that appears to have a high accuracy for identifying mold from cultures. 149 Next-generation sequencing has the potential to detect IMIs from blood specimens 150 and holds promise for earlier diagnosis of these infections.…”
Section: Diagnosis Changes In Diagnosis and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Quantitative PCR in serum 136,137 or tissue 138,139 are available for some species (e.g., Mucor, Rhizopus, Lichtheimia, Rhizomucor) 136,137,[140][141][142][143][144] and may be superior to culture. [145][146][147][148] Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight is another tool that appears to have a high accuracy for identifying mold from cultures. 149 Next-generation sequencing has the potential to detect IMIs from blood specimens 150 and holds promise for earlier diagnosis of these infections.…”
Section: Diagnosis Changes In Diagnosis and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional and real-time PCR assays for the direct detection of minute amounts of Mucorales DNA from fresh or FFPE tissue, BALF, and serum have been reported with the majority targeting the ITS, 18S, or 28S rDNA (Hammond et al, 2011;Millon et al, 2013Millon et al, , 2015Lackner et al, 2014;Springer et al, 2016a,b;Gholinejad-Ghadi et al, 2018). The key to effective molecular diagnosis, however, is efficient DNA extraction from the clinical specimen.…”
Section: Pcr Detection Of Mucormycosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key to effective molecular diagnosis, however, is efficient DNA extraction from the clinical specimen. To date, PCR detection from fresh or FFPE tissue has been the preferred method to identify the causative mucormycete with sensitivities in FFPE tissue of 56-91% (Springer et al, 2016b;Gholinejad-Ghadi et al, 2018). Negative results from FFPE samples may be due to presence of very small amounts of fungal DNA and/or cross-linking of proteins and fragmentation of DNA during formalin fixation (Gholinejad-Ghadi et al, 2018).…”
Section: Pcr Detection Of Mucormycosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review included seven studies carried out in 2001-2017 [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] devoted to assessing the effectiveness of molecular methods for the diagnosis of mucormycosis in hematological patients. We analyzed the data from a survey of 116 oncohematological patients with mucormycosis presented in these articles ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all the works selected for this review, molecular diagnosis of mucormycosis was carried out using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Four studies used real-time PCR (RT PCR) for 18S rDNA [14][15][16][17]; in two studies, the 18S rDNA region was amplified using endpoint detection [18,19]. One study was based entirely on the determination of the sequence of internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%