2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-017-1298-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of high-confidence RNA regulatory elements by combinatorial classification of RNA–protein binding sites

Abstract: Crosslinking immunoprecipitation sequencing (CLIP-seq) technologies have enabled researchers to characterize transcriptome-wide binding sites of RNA-binding protein (RBP) with high resolution. We apply a soft-clustering method, RBPgroup, to various CLIP-seq datasets to group together RBPs that specifically bind the same RNA sites. Such combinatorial clustering of RBPs helps interpret CLIP-seq data and suggests functional RNA regulatory elements. Furthermore, we validate two RBP–RBP interactions in cell lines. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF) 90 to group cCREs into cis regulatory modules based on their relative accessibility across major clusters. We adapted NMF (Python package: sklearn 91 ) to decompose the cell-by-cCRE matrix V (N×M, N rows: cCRE, M columns: cell clusters) into a coefficient matrix H (R×M, R rows: number of modules) and a basis matrix W (N×R), with a given rank R: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF) 90 to group cCREs into cis regulatory modules based on their relative accessibility across major clusters. We adapted NMF (Python package: sklearn 91 ) to decompose the cell-by-cCRE matrix V (N×M, N rows: cCRE, M columns: cell clusters) into a coefficient matrix H (R×M, R rows: number of modules) and a basis matrix W (N×R), with a given rank R: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-negative matrix factorisation can then be used to group together RBPs that bind to the same sites to explore co-operativity (83,89) . This does enable more reliable comparison across experiments, but it is best to avoid comparing RBPs for which different peak calling tools were used, or different types of CLIP methods, since this could result in differences that are of technical nature (89) .…”
Section: Integrative Analysis Of Clip Data Across Rbpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-negative matrix factorisation can then be used to group together RBPs that bind to the same sites to explore co-operativity (83,89) . This does enable more reliable comparison across experiments, but it is best to avoid comparing RBPs for which different peak calling tools were used, or different types of CLIP methods, since this could result in differences that are of technical nature (89) . Ideally, if a comparison is being undertaken using publically available data, the approach taken by POSTAR should be bolstered by first assessing whether the quality of the experiment is sufficient even to proceed with a comparison, and second by using the same peak calling procedure for all the RBPs that are part of the same comparison.…”
Section: Integrative Analysis Of Clip Data Across Rbpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most widely used techniques involves immunopurification of specific RNA-binding proteins from cellular extracts followed by a high-throughput analysis of the co-purified RNA species [14]. The coupling of this technique to powerful bioinformatic analysis has led researchers to understand the binding specificity of cis-acting elements [15]. The advent of new technology such as next generation sequencing (NGS) and chemical cross-linking procedures has allowed for finescale mapping of cis-binding motifs as well as for the refinement of RNA-binding proteinbinding sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%