2022
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2063408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing, GIS, machine learning and electrical resistivity tomography techniques in Guelma basin, northeastern Algeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mine DC method cannot accurately delineate anomalies, and its inversion methods require further research. Further research is also needed on well-ground and interhole resistivity imaging techniques, as well as 3D resistivity imaging and other emerging technologies [47,48].…”
Section: Direct Current Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mine DC method cannot accurately delineate anomalies, and its inversion methods require further research. Further research is also needed on well-ground and interhole resistivity imaging techniques, as well as 3D resistivity imaging and other emerging technologies [47,48].…”
Section: Direct Current Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a geographical standpoint, ML-GPM studies have been carried out mainly in Asia, while there are very few in the African continent (Braham et al, 2022;Gómez-Escalonilla et al, 2021, 2022Martínez-Santos and Renard, 2020;Namous et al, 2021). Moreover, ours is one of the first studies in the literature addressing groundwater potential based on a multiclass approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The recent literature showcases several examples of ML algorithms in groundwater potential mapping studies. These include support vector machines (Al-Fugara et al, 2022;Panahi et al, 2020), decision trees (Al-Abadi et al, 2021;Arabameri et al, 2021;Braham et al, 2022), artificial neural networks (Chen et al, 2021;Nguyen et al, 2020;Hakim et al, 2022), and ensemble methods like boosting, random forests and extra trees classification, among others (Bai et al, 2022;Choudhary et al, 2022;Gómez-Escalonilla et al, 2021, 2022Martinsen et al, 2022;Sachdeva and Kumar, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify groundwater potential zones, some studies have combined the GIS and RS with the multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) models (Saaty 2008;Aneesh and Deka 2015;Singh et al 2018;Maize et al, 2020). A few of them are the fuzzy logic (Mallick et al 2019), certainty factor (CF) (Razandi et al 2015), weighted overlay index (Prasad et al 2008), probabilistic models such as frequency ratio (FR) (Thapa et al 2017;Das and Pardeshi 2018;Braham et al 2022), multi-influencing factor (MIF) (Acharya et al 2019); machine learning (Saha et al 2022), and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) (Agarwal et al 2013;Ajay Kumar et al 2020;Arshad et al 2022;Aissaoui et al 2023). It is found that the use of the AHP model via GIS is an efficient and effective technique for the spatial data management, and also utilized to identify groundwater potential zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%