2020
DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202019204001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of geodynamic movements based on the results of geodetic monitoring measurements

Abstract: The methodology and results of an experimental study of modern geodynamic movements using the data from geodetic deformation monitoring are presented. The related issues of modeling natural, anthropogenic, and ecological systems are considered. A technique for visualizing geodynamic movements based on the results of cyclic geodetic measurements, which allows to reasonably identify active geological structures, blocks, tectonic faults, is presented. It is shown that as a key source of information on geodynamic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. The distance R at which the geodynamic influence of man-made objects on the array can be felt is estimated from 3-5 of their sizes r [Dahm et al, 2012] to 20-30 r according to geodynamic monitoring [Panzhin, 2020] and even more [Dobrovolsky., 1991]. Since the dimensions of the UGS r considered are the first kilometers, we assumed that the radius of their geodynamic influence area R reaches 100 km in the situation under consideration and analyzed the seismic events that occurred at this distance from the UGS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The distance R at which the geodynamic influence of man-made objects on the array can be felt is estimated from 3-5 of their sizes r [Dahm et al, 2012] to 20-30 r according to geodynamic monitoring [Panzhin, 2020] and even more [Dobrovolsky., 1991]. Since the dimensions of the UGS r considered are the first kilometers, we assumed that the radius of their geodynamic influence area R reaches 100 km in the situation under consideration and analyzed the seismic events that occurred at this distance from the UGS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%