2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00660.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of genes associated with ovarian cancer metastasis using microarray expression analysis

Abstract: Although the transition from early- to advanced-stage ovarian cancer is a critical determinant of survival, little is known about the molecular underpinnings of ovarian metastasis. We hypothesize that microarray analysis of global gene expression patterns in primary ovarian cancer and metastatic omental implants can identify genes that underlie the metastatic process in epithelial ovarian cancer. We utilized Affymetrix U95Av2 microarrays to characterize the molecular alterations that underlie omental metastasi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the differences noted in recurrences compared with primary specimens, we found that expression of some of the markers (i.e., PGP as well as EGFR, BCRP, RRM1, and TOPO1) also differed in recurrent specimens taken from the same patient at different times during the course of disease. These differences may reflect alterations in gene expression programs that are dependent on the site of the tumor as suggested by genomic profiling studies of primary ovarian and omental lesions (22) or the genotypic divergence observed in multiple metastases derived from matched primary tumors obtained from untreated patients (23). In our study, the recurrences tested were obtained from patients who had received 1 to 5 prior therapies, so it is also possible that the chemotherapy regimen received in the intervening time period either induced/repressed expression of these proteins or selected for a preexisting tumor cell population with an altered expression of that marker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the differences noted in recurrences compared with primary specimens, we found that expression of some of the markers (i.e., PGP as well as EGFR, BCRP, RRM1, and TOPO1) also differed in recurrent specimens taken from the same patient at different times during the course of disease. These differences may reflect alterations in gene expression programs that are dependent on the site of the tumor as suggested by genomic profiling studies of primary ovarian and omental lesions (22) or the genotypic divergence observed in multiple metastases derived from matched primary tumors obtained from untreated patients (23). In our study, the recurrences tested were obtained from patients who had received 1 to 5 prior therapies, so it is also possible that the chemotherapy regimen received in the intervening time period either induced/repressed expression of these proteins or selected for a preexisting tumor cell population with an altered expression of that marker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, differential expression of NM23-H1, KAI1 and MKK4 genes has not been reported in primary ovarian tumors compared to metastatic lesions of EOC in two recent global gene expression analyses. 17,18 On the other hand, metastasis suppressor roles of these three genes in ovarian cancer have been speculated by previous studies at the protein level. 7,12,15,19 A summary of the studies investigating the expression levels of NM23-H1, KAI1 and MKK4 genes in clinical samples are given in Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Recent studies have highlighted the importance of this gene in the oncogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma and ovarian adenocarcinoma. [9][10][11] Overexpression of the p53 gene in keratinocytes above and adjacent to the cornoid lamella in porokeratosis lesions has also been demonstrated, resulting in early apoptosis and abnormal differentiation of these cells. This finding suggests its involvement in the pathogenesis of these lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%