2006
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl1033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of functional, endogenous programmed −1 ribosomal frameshift signals in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: In viruses, programmed −1 ribosomal frameshifting (−1 PRF) signals direct the translation of alternative proteins from a single mRNA. Given that many basic regulatory mechanisms were first discovered in viral systems, the current study endeavored to: (i) identify −1 PRF signals in genomic databases, (ii) apply the protocol to the yeast genome and (iii) test selected candidates at the bench. Computational analyses revealed the presence of 10 340 consensus −1 PRF signals in the yeast genome. Of the 6353 yeast OR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(85 reference statements)
1
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a strong evolutionary selection is observed that eliminates sequences that are strongly prone to frameshifting in protein-coding genes 111 . Such selection is also observed for some 112 , but not all, weakly frameshiftprone sequences [113][114][115] , and in both cases they are frequently found among coding regions [112][113][114][115] . These patterns of occurrence suggest that abortive frameshifting at low frequency might also be beneficial for regulatory purposes under certain conditions.…”
Section: Isoacceptormentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, a strong evolutionary selection is observed that eliminates sequences that are strongly prone to frameshifting in protein-coding genes 111 . Such selection is also observed for some 112 , but not all, weakly frameshiftprone sequences [113][114][115] , and in both cases they are frequently found among coding regions [112][113][114][115] . These patterns of occurrence suggest that abortive frameshifting at low frequency might also be beneficial for regulatory purposes under certain conditions.…”
Section: Isoacceptormentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Whereas +1 frameshifting can be triggered when the A site contains a stop codon or a sense codon decoded by a rare tRNA, 21 frameshifting relies on a slippery sequence that allows repairing of the A-and P-site tRNAs with the mRNA and on a downstream secondary structure that impedes forward movement of the ribosome. Computational approaches to identify slippery sites and potential downstream pseudoknot structures predict that as many as 10% of yeast genes, including several genes controlling telomere maintenance (Table 3, Advani et al 2013), contain a frameshift signal (Jacobs et al 2007;Belew et al 2008) and that frameshifting on these sites impacts mRNA levels by activating the nonsense-mediated decay pathway (Belew et al 2011).…”
Section: Ribosomal Frameshiftingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational analyses suggest that ∼10% of eukaryotic cellular mRNAs harbor operational −1 PRF signals (30). Over 95% of these frameshift events are predicted to function as mRNA destabilizing elements through the nonsensemediated mRNA decay pathway by directing translating ribosomes to premature termination codons (31). More recently, −1 PRF was implicated in telomere maintenance in yeast (23).…”
Section: Translational Fidelity Defects Of the Rpl10-r98s Mutant Affementioning
confidence: 99%