1999
DOI: 10.1021/bc990039x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Fluorescein-5‘-Isothiocyanate-Modification Sites in Proteins by Electrospray-Ionization Mass Spectrometry

Abstract: Model peptides and proteins, such as hen eggwhite lysozyme, have been modified with fluorescein-5'-isothiocyanate (FITC) to yield the corresponding fluorescein-thiocarbamoyl (FTC) conjugates (N, N'-disubstituted thiourea and dithiourethane adducts). The extent of FITC incorporation, i.e., number of modified residues, has been identified by direct molecular weight determination using matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization and electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS; ESI-MS). A specific fragment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An abundant ion corresponding to the mass of the derivatized N-terminal tryptic peptide (FITC-Gly 1 -Lys 9 ) was observed at m/z 611.72 ϩ ), respectively. The observance of these ions is consistent with reports that the fluorescein adduct is labile under collisional activation conditions (38). Although the MS/MS spectrum did not contain a fragment that specifically located the site of conjugation, observance of the FITC-Gly 1 -Lys 9 tryptic peptide provides sufficient evidence to confidently assign the primary labeling site to the N-terminal glycine residue, since modification of Lys 9 would have prevented tryptic digestion at this site (39).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…An abundant ion corresponding to the mass of the derivatized N-terminal tryptic peptide (FITC-Gly 1 -Lys 9 ) was observed at m/z 611.72 ϩ ), respectively. The observance of these ions is consistent with reports that the fluorescein adduct is labile under collisional activation conditions (38). Although the MS/MS spectrum did not contain a fragment that specifically located the site of conjugation, observance of the FITC-Gly 1 -Lys 9 tryptic peptide provides sufficient evidence to confidently assign the primary labeling site to the N-terminal glycine residue, since modification of Lys 9 would have prevented tryptic digestion at this site (39).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…2a) and with 25 mm wide channels separated by 25 mm spacing (Fig. 2b) that were 10 mm deep and the entire assembly was exposed to oxygen plasma for 60 s. To visualize the patterned PLL after plasma exposure, FITC reacted with PLL using a previously published method; 21 bright regions in the fluorescence micrograph indicate FITC-conjugated PLL, and the dark regions correspond to bare glass where PLL film was removed. The degree of PLL etching was estimated by measuring the fluorescence intensity and line width of FITC-conjugated PLL patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patterned PLL was visualized by conjugating fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, Molecular Probes, OR) to PLL via -NH 2 groups. 21 Fluorescence microscopy was used to image FITCconjugated PLL. Sterile bacteriological polystyrene (PS) Petri dish (Fisher, PA) were used as received.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trypsin digestion of the isolated protein-dye conjugates followed the procedure outlined by Schnaible and Przybylski (1999). Methanol and 3 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.8 were added to bring the lysozyme-dye conjugate concentration to 1 mg/mL and 30% (v/v) methanol.…”
Section: Maldi-tofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since most proteins contain multiple primary amino groups, a number of different products of the labeling reaction differing in the number and location of the attached probes are expected. In order to resolve this uncertainty, several studies have used mass spectrometry to characterize the products of protein labeling reactions and determined the location of the attached probes on the surface of the protein (Grunwaldt et al, 2002;Schnaible and Przybylski, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%