2004
DOI: 10.4116/jaqua.43.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Flaking Techniques: From the Analysis of Fracture Wings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FW analysis is a method that allows identification of debitage techniques based on the crack velocity calculated from microscopic traces on flake scars (see Hutchings 1999;Takakura 2012;Takakura and Izuho 2004). This method has an obvious advantage for analyzing the debitage technique over common ones depending on the morphological observations of the surface features of the study samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FW analysis is a method that allows identification of debitage techniques based on the crack velocity calculated from microscopic traces on flake scars (see Hutchings 1999;Takakura 2012;Takakura and Izuho 2004). This method has an obvious advantage for analyzing the debitage technique over common ones depending on the morphological observations of the surface features of the study samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to identify flaking techniques from the assessment of crack velocity through the analysis of fracture wings observed on flaking surfaces [66]. In a large proportion of cases in Hokkaido, microblades were systematically detached by pressure flaking, with the exception of some cases [67][68][69][70][71].…”
Section: Microblade Technology In the Terminal Pleistocenementioning
confidence: 99%