2015
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of false-negative mutations missed by next-generation sequencing in retinitis pigmentosa patients: a complementary approach to clinical genetic diagnostic testing

Abstract: Conclusion:In brief, we support the need for a complementary approach to identify mutations undetected by NGS, underscoring the power and significance of combining coverage-based analysis with additional target screening of low-depth regions in improving diagnosis of genetic diseases. In addition to its usefulness in RP, this approach is likely applicable to other Mendelian diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huang et al determined that next-generation sequencing has the potential to miss causative variants in the RPGR gene, accounting for 70–75% of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa cases. 24 In the currently described exome approach, most of the RPGR gene had a coverage above 20 ×, but approximately 30% of the RPGR-ORF15 exon 15, a mutation hotspot region, had less than 10 × coverage. Nevertheless, the RPGR gene was the fourth most frequently mutated gene in our cohort, demonstrating that our approach is able to detect causative RPGR variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al determined that next-generation sequencing has the potential to miss causative variants in the RPGR gene, accounting for 70–75% of X-linked retinitis pigmentosa cases. 24 In the currently described exome approach, most of the RPGR gene had a coverage above 20 ×, but approximately 30% of the RPGR-ORF15 exon 15, a mutation hotspot region, had less than 10 × coverage. Nevertheless, the RPGR gene was the fourth most frequently mutated gene in our cohort, demonstrating that our approach is able to detect causative RPGR variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 As a result, genetic tests such as microarrays, metabolic screening, or traditional gene testing may still be more suitable for consideration given a clear diagnostic indication, 30 such as in cases 1 and 2 here that underwent panel or single gene testing. Interpretation of variants of unknown significance remains a significant challenge in diagnostic WES, and the issue of secondary (incidental) findings continues to evolve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, highly GC-rich, highly repetitive and/or homologous regions could not be captured, sequenced, and aligned unambiguously by targeted capture NGS [47,48]. For example, the open reading frame 15 (ORF15) of RPGR gene, which is a RP mutational hotspot, contains a ~300 bp highly repetitive region that cannot be unambiguously analyzed by conventional capture NGS [12,49,50]. Long-range PCR followed by NGS may be used to identify variants in these regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%