2012
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2012.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of factors that function in Drosophila salivary gland cell death during development using proteomics

Abstract: Proteasome inhibitors induce cell death and are used in cancer therapy, but little is known about the relationship between proteasome impairment and cell death under normal physiological conditions. Here, we investigate the relationship between proteasome function and larval salivary gland cell death during development in Drosophila. Drosophila larval salivary gland cells undergo synchronized programmed cell death requiring both caspases and autophagy (Atg) genes during development. Here, we show that ubiquiti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, genetic or pharmacological activation of autophagy facilitates aggregate clearance and neuronal function in disease models [1,5]. Chronic block of proteasomal degradation also leads to toxicity, ER stress and cell death in various mammalian and Drosophila cells, and proteasome inhibitors are in clinical use to trigger apoptosis of cancer cells in multiple myeloma patients [31-34]. While we found no evidence of cell death in larval Drosophila fat body upon silencing of genes encoding essential subunits of the proteasome or genetic activation of hypoxia signaling, these genetic manipulations strongly enhanced both basal and starvation-induced autophagy in these cells, and this effect was dependent on canonical autophagy genes Atg1, Vps34, Atg9, Atg4 and Atg12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, genetic or pharmacological activation of autophagy facilitates aggregate clearance and neuronal function in disease models [1,5]. Chronic block of proteasomal degradation also leads to toxicity, ER stress and cell death in various mammalian and Drosophila cells, and proteasome inhibitors are in clinical use to trigger apoptosis of cancer cells in multiple myeloma patients [31-34]. While we found no evidence of cell death in larval Drosophila fat body upon silencing of genes encoding essential subunits of the proteasome or genetic activation of hypoxia signaling, these genetic manipulations strongly enhanced both basal and starvation-induced autophagy in these cells, and this effect was dependent on canonical autophagy genes Atg1, Vps34, Atg9, Atg4 and Atg12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the visualization of specific autophagic structures (autophagosomes) in dying cells has led to the belief that autophagy could be a non‐apoptotic form of programmed cell death . The best‐accepted example of autophagy as a cell death effector is the degradation of the salivary glands during pupal transition in Drosophila . In mammals, the possibility that autophagy could lead to cell death under persistent stress conditions appears still controversial and most evidence indicates that, at least in cells with intact apoptotic machinery, autophagy is primarily a pro‐survival rather than a pro‐death mechanism .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This activation of rpr , dronc , and hid , as well as the partial repression of the apoptosis inhibitor diap1 by CBP ( Yin et al 2007 ), are key events in the initiation of salivary gland histolysis. To understand better the events of salivary gland cell death, large-scale genetic ( Wang et al 2008 ) and molecular ( Gorski et al 2003 ; Lee et al 2003 ; Martin et al 2007 ; McPhee et al 2013 ) screens have been conducted to identify additional genes that mediate the death response. The genes identified encode functionally diverse products, including an RNA helicase ( Ihry et al 2012 ), chromatin remodelers ( Ihry and Bashirullah 2014 ), an enzyme of the TCA cycle ( Wang et al 2010 ), subunits of the mediator complex ( Wang et al 2010 ), subunits of the cop9 signalsome ( McPhee et al 2013 ), several autophagy (Atg) proteins ( Berry and Baehrecke 2007 ), and several proteins of unknown function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%