2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-009-9474-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of European and Asian pears using EST-SSRs from Pyrus

Abstract: Ten EST-SSRs previously isolated from Pyrus were used to identify 81 P. communis, 13 P. pyrifolia and 20 P. ussuriensis or P. 9 bretschneideri accessions. Cross-transference of these EST-SSRs was high in these species. PYC-008 and PYC-004 were the least informative SSRs in each of the pear species and were monomorphic in P. pyrifolia while PYC-013, PYC-002 and PYC009b were the most informative in all species. ESTSSRs were very valuable for identification of incorrectly identified accessions, failed grafts and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed heterozygosity at the different loci ranged from 0.14 (TXY16) to 0.89 (TXY104) with a mean of 0.49, which was lower than 0.63 reported in genomic SSR marker analysis in Pyrus Bao et al, 2007), consistent with the expectation that genebased SSRs developed from transcribed regions are less polymorphic than genome-derived SSRs. However, this was similar to values of 0.44 for Malus EST-SSRs in European pears (Wünsch and Hormaza, 2007) and 0.48 for Pyrus EST-SSRs in identification of European and Asian pears (Bassil and Postman, 2010). Another important index of the level of polymorphism, PIC values, displayed high polymorphism at each locus, ranging from 0.26 to 0.91 with an average of 0.75.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Genetic Relationship Among 28 Pyrus Accesssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The observed heterozygosity at the different loci ranged from 0.14 (TXY16) to 0.89 (TXY104) with a mean of 0.49, which was lower than 0.63 reported in genomic SSR marker analysis in Pyrus Bao et al, 2007), consistent with the expectation that genebased SSRs developed from transcribed regions are less polymorphic than genome-derived SSRs. However, this was similar to values of 0.44 for Malus EST-SSRs in European pears (Wünsch and Hormaza, 2007) and 0.48 for Pyrus EST-SSRs in identification of European and Asian pears (Bassil and Postman, 2010). Another important index of the level of polymorphism, PIC values, displayed high polymorphism at each locus, ranging from 0.26 to 0.91 with an average of 0.75.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Genetic Relationship Among 28 Pyrus Accesssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…A variety of PCR-based DNA markers, such as random-amplified polymorphic DNA, microsatellite or simple sequence repeat (SSR), inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR), amplified fragment length polymorphism, and sequence-related amplified polymorphism, provide the opportunity for fine-scale genetic characterizations, and still generate a large amount of data in a short period of time. Therefore, they are frequently used for genetic diversity assessment (Maguire et al, 2002;Gillaspie et al, 2005), variety identification (Hurtado et al, 1999;Bassil and Postman, 2010), genetic map construction (Piquemal et al, 2005;Celyon et al, 2008), pedigree analysis (Dreisigacker et al, 2004), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSR markers have been isolated and successfully used for cultivar identification, genetic diversity and relationship analysis of Pyrus (Yamamoto et al 2001(Yamamoto et al , 2002a(Yamamoto et al , b, 2004Kimura et al 2002;Wünsch and Hormaza 2007;Bao et al 2007;Katayama et al 2007;Bassil and Postman 2010). By now, the study on Ussurian Pear was not enough, especially with wild accessions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%