1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.55.2214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of electron-irradiation defects in semi-insulating GaAs by normalized thermally stimulated current measurements

Abstract: Primary defects induced by 1 MeV electron irradiation have been quantitatively studied in semi-insulating ͑SI͒ GaAs by using normalized thermally stimulated current spectroscopy, a new technique. Defects identical to ͑or similar to͒ those known in the thermally stimulated current literature as T 6 *(0.13 eV), T 5 ͑0.34 eV͒, and T 4 ͑0.31 eV͒ are produced at rates 0.70, 0.08, and 0.23 cm Ϫ1 , respectively; T 5 is also a strong trap in unirradiated SI GaAs. The defects T 6 * and T 4 correspond closely to the irr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…energy necessary to displace an atom will be a few hundred keV; thus the common choice of 1-MeV irradiation will produce only one, or at most a few, displacements and no massive damage, such as is often found with heavy-ion irradiation. In the case of El induced defects in GaAs, either semiconducting or semi-insulating, it was concluded that the major defects induced by 1-MeV electrons are associated with the displacement of As atoms, resulting in As Frenkel pairs, VA.-Asi [11,13]. The EI-induced trap E3 in n-type GaAs, mentioned above, has a thermal activation energy of 0.3 eV, with a Franck-Condon shift of 0.2 eV, and is believed to be related to the As Frenkel pair [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…energy necessary to displace an atom will be a few hundred keV; thus the common choice of 1-MeV irradiation will produce only one, or at most a few, displacements and no massive damage, such as is often found with heavy-ion irradiation. In the case of El induced defects in GaAs, either semiconducting or semi-insulating, it was concluded that the major defects induced by 1-MeV electrons are associated with the displacement of As atoms, resulting in As Frenkel pairs, VA.-Asi [11,13]. The EI-induced trap E3 in n-type GaAs, mentioned above, has a thermal activation energy of 0.3 eV, with a Franck-Condon shift of 0.2 eV, and is believed to be related to the As Frenkel pair [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the effects of 270-keV N 2 1 implantation and annealing, two deep centers, with activation energies of 0.60 eV and 0.67 eV, are believed to be N antisite and N interstitial, respectively [9]. Although vacancy defects in Si [10] and GaAs [11][12][13] induced by high-energy electron irradiation (EI) have been extensively studied in the past, only two, recent studies have been conducted in GaN [14,15], to our knowledge. In the first of these, Linde et al [14] used optically detected magnetic resonance of a photoluminescence band at 0.93 eV, produced by 2.5-MeV-electron irradiation, to obtain a tentative identification of a Gainterstitial complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1,2 To control the material quality, it is important to understand the nature of the deep traps in the SI material. To this end, we have successfully applied thermally stimulated current (TSC) spectroscopy, which is known to be a very sensitive technique for investigating point-defect and impurity-related traps in various SI semiconductors, such as HPSI GaAs and InP, [3][4][5] and carbon-doped SI-GaN. 6 In this paper, we present (1) the fundamentals of TSC spectroscopy; (2) typical TSC spectra measured on two types of HPSI 4H-SiC material, grown by physical vapor transport (PVT) 1 and high-temperature chemical vapor deposition (HTCVD); 2 and (3) theoretical fitting of a dominant hole trap (peaking at ϳ150 K) related to boron.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Although the application of the TSC technique to Fe-doped InP has revealed at least six traps in the range 80 to 250K, 7-9 the connection of these deep centers with particular point defects in SI InP is still not clear. 5,6 Although the application of the TSC technique to Fe-doped InP has revealed at least six traps in the range 80 to 250K, 7-9 the connection of these deep centers with particular point defects in SI InP is still not clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%