Identification of earlier predictors of pregnancy complications through wearable technologies in a Brazilian multicentre cohort: Maternal Actigraphy Exploratory Study I (MAES-I) study protocol
Abstract:IntroductionNon-invasive tools capable of identifying predictors of maternal complications would be a step forward for improving maternal and perinatal health. There is an association between modification in physical activity (PA) and sleep–wake patterns and the occurrence of inflammatory, metabolic, pathological conditions related to chronic diseases. The actigraphy device is validated to estimate PA and sleep–wake patterns among pregnant women. In order to extend the window of opportunity to prevent, diagnos… Show more
“…The use of sensors and actigraphy to monitor sleep quality, activity patterns, and movement in patients is a novel approach to the quantification of lifestyle-related behaviors that might affect health [135,136]. Although this strategy has been underexplored, altered sleep patterns during pregnancy have been shown to lead to differential gene expression in mothers [137].…”
Section: Challenges and Potential Of Complex Datamentioning
A multitude of clinical, biological, environmental, and demographic factors influence the trajectory of a pregnancy. Maternal genetics, environment, stress, nutrition, medical history, socioeconomic status, and racial and ethnic background all play a role in determining the success of a pregnancy. Diverse data sources are available for the study of pregnancy and prediction of adverse outcomes, including electronic health records (EHRs) and administrative claims data, high-throughput multiomics data for characterizing biological systems, and more complex sources like time series, imaging and video data, and text. Recent advances in multiview, multitask, and deep learning allow joint modeling across data sources as well as across outcomes and demonstrate the vast potential of such integrated approaches.
“…The use of sensors and actigraphy to monitor sleep quality, activity patterns, and movement in patients is a novel approach to the quantification of lifestyle-related behaviors that might affect health [135,136]. Although this strategy has been underexplored, altered sleep patterns during pregnancy have been shown to lead to differential gene expression in mothers [137].…”
Section: Challenges and Potential Of Complex Datamentioning
A multitude of clinical, biological, environmental, and demographic factors influence the trajectory of a pregnancy. Maternal genetics, environment, stress, nutrition, medical history, socioeconomic status, and racial and ethnic background all play a role in determining the success of a pregnancy. Diverse data sources are available for the study of pregnancy and prediction of adverse outcomes, including electronic health records (EHRs) and administrative claims data, high-throughput multiomics data for characterizing biological systems, and more complex sources like time series, imaging and video data, and text. Recent advances in multiview, multitask, and deep learning allow joint modeling across data sources as well as across outcomes and demonstrate the vast potential of such integrated approaches.
“…The Maternal Actigraphy Exploratory Study I (MAES‐I) project is a prospective cohort study that included nulliparous singleton pregnant women from mid‐pregnancy to childbirth in four Brazilian centers from March 2018 to March 2020. The study protocol has been previously published 18 . Briefly, the study was designed to explore predictors of gestational complications, including clinical conditions and patterns of physical activity and sleep, based on actigraphy data by means of a wearable wrist actigraphy device used 24 hours/day uninterruptedly, from 19 to 21 weeks until childbirth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study protocol has been previously published. 18 Briefly, the study was designed to explore predictors of gestational complications, including clinical conditions and patterns of physical activity and sleep, based on actigraphy data by means of a wearable wrist actigraphy device used 24 hours/day uninterruptedly, from 19 to 21 weeks until childbirth. Singleton pregnant women were considered eligible until 21 weeks of pregnancy.…”
Objective: To compare the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14) and the original 25-item scale in the obstetric population, including vulnerable and non-vulnerable women.Methods: A Brazilian prospective cohort study was conducted of nulliparous singleton pregnant women from March 2018 to March 2020. Women who completed the RS-25 at 27-29 weeks of pregnancy were included in the analysis. RS-25 and RS-14 scores were converted to comparable scales of 0-100. Medians, standard deviations, and centiles between versions were compared for the general, vulnerable, and non-vulnerable populations. Correlation, concordance, and internal consistency and reliability analyses were performed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:In total, 381 women who completed the RS-25 were included. Medians of RS-14 and RS-25 scores were significantly different (73.4 and 70.8, respectively; P < 0.001), regardless of the vulnerability status. The RS-14 showed a high correlation (Pearson´s correlation coefficient of −0.379 (P-value < 0.001)), but no agreement (Pitman's test of difference in variance: r = 0.422; P < 0.001) with the RS-25 version. RS-14 showed high internal consistency and reliability with only one component (Variance of 59.82%, Cronbach's Alpha 0.947).
Conclusion:The RS-14 may overestimate the RS-25 score and different domains may not be assessed by the short version. The psychometric properties of the RS-14 and the clinical relevance of the variation between versions require further evaluation.
“…Despite the clinical relevance of early infection detection, encouraging results from previous studies as well as successful use of wearables in pregnant women for other indications [24,[27][28][29][30], to our knowledge, no study on the usability of wearable sensors for prediction of intraamniotic infection has been performed yet. We therefore evaluate the detection of infection in women with PPROM using noninvasive parameters measured by a wearable device within a prospective proof of principle study.…”
Purpose
To evaluate the use of wearable sensors for prediction of intraamniotic infection in pregnant women with PPROM.
Materials and methods
In a prospective proof of principle study, we included 50 patients diagnosed with PPROM at the University Hospital Zurich between November 2017 and May 2020. Patients were instructed to wear a bracelet during the night, which measures physiological parameters including wrist skin temperature, heart rate, heart rate variability, and breathing rate. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed to evaluate the difference over time of both the wearable device measured parameters and standard clinical monitoring values, such as body temperature, pulse, leucocytes, and C-reactive protein, between women with and without intraamniotic infection.
Results
Altogether, 23 patients (46%) were diagnosed with intraamniotic infection. Regarding the physiological parameters measured with the bracelet, we observed a significant difference in breathing rate (19 vs 16 per min, P < .01) and heart rate (72 vs 67 beats per min, P = .03) in women with intraamniotic infection compared to those without during the 3 days prior to birth.
In parallel to these changes standard clinical monitoring values were significantly different in the intraamniotic infection group compared to women without infection in the 3 days preceding birth.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that wearable sensors are a promising, noninvasive, patient friendly approach to support the early detection of intraamniotic infection in women with PPROM. However, confirmation of our findings in larger studies is required before implementing this technique in standard clinical management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.