2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.114651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of dominant factors contributing to photocurrent density of BiVO4 photoanodes using Machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have documented significant variability in the PEC performance of hematite samples, even when prepared under identical conditions. This variability was linked to certain features identified through analytical data. , It was also observed that some hematite samples exhibited no photoelectrode activity. Utilizing a categorization approach based on ML, we were able to not only detect these inactive samples but also trace their lack of activity to specific causes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have documented significant variability in the PEC performance of hematite samples, even when prepared under identical conditions. This variability was linked to certain features identified through analytical data. , It was also observed that some hematite samples exhibited no photoelectrode activity. Utilizing a categorization approach based on ML, we were able to not only detect these inactive samples but also trace their lack of activity to specific causes .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our strategy confronts the paucity of data head-on by integrating analytical data with ML approaches, a method that has seen success in several photocatalytic materials and devices. The studies generated dozens of samples using a consistent method and analyzed them through techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, UV/vis absorption spectroscopy, and photoelectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (PEIS). By using data descriptors such as peaks and patterns from these analyses, the research successfully predicted photocurrent values and pinpointed key factors affecting performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical data for the samples are sophisticated descriptors to represent samples to predict the physical parameters even by using a small amount of data. 20,30 We prepared dozens of samples under the same preparation procedure, and they were analyzed with various analytical methods, such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, UV/vis absorption spectroscopy, and photoelectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (PEIS). The peaks/patterns in the analytical data were used as the descriptors of the samples, and they were used for the prediction of the photocurrent values representing their performance.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the problem, we used a combination of analytical data for representing the samples, and these combinations were applicable for the performance prediction via ML, even for a small amount of data. The analytical data for the samples are sophisticated descriptors to represent samples to predict the physical parameters even by using a small amount of data. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%