2015
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of DNA lesions using a third base pair for amplification and nanopore sequencing

Abstract: Damage to the genome is implicated in the progression of cancer and stress-induced diseases. DNA lesions exist in low levels, and cannot be amplified by standard PCR because they are frequently strong blocks to polymerases. Here, we describe a method for PCR amplification of lesion-containing DNA in which the site and identity could be marked, copied and sequenced. Critical for this method is installation of either the dNaM or d5SICS nucleotides at the lesion site after processing via the base excision repair … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Insertion of the PQS and nicking endonuclease recognition sequences was achieved using restriction-free cloning, followed by transformation to competent Escherichia coli and isolation by miniprep kit (Qiagen), as described previously (38). The site-specific modifications were synthesized into short oligomers with the sequence between the two nicking endonuclease sites and they were inserted into the plasmid via literature methods (38,39). Confirmation that the DNA modifications were introduced into the plasmid was achieved using a protocol established in the C.J.B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insertion of the PQS and nicking endonuclease recognition sequences was achieved using restriction-free cloning, followed by transformation to competent Escherichia coli and isolation by miniprep kit (Qiagen), as described previously (38). The site-specific modifications were synthesized into short oligomers with the sequence between the two nicking endonuclease sites and they were inserted into the plasmid via literature methods (38,39). Confirmation that the DNA modifications were introduced into the plasmid was achieved using a protocol established in the C.J.B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many laboratories have developed antibody-based OG sequencing that provides a low resolution sequence map of OG (~10–1000 kbp) [53, 54]. Recently, our laboratory developed an OG sequencing approach with single-nucleotide resolution implemented on plasmid DNA [55], in addition to an OG sequencing method with ~0.15-kbp resolution (i.e., OG-Seq) that was implemented on the mouse genome [56]. Expansion of sequencing studies, ideally at single-nucleotide resolution, to different cell types under a variety of conditions (i.e., different stressors or cell states) will be essential to the determination of the sequences in which OG is preferentially formed, whether these sequences and regions change based on cellular conditions, and whether they are gene regulatory regions.…”
Section: How Does Og Fit Into the Epigenetic Landscape?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other sequencing-based methods developed over the last years allow direct sequencing of different lesion types, either by the analysis of alterations in the kinetics of DNA polymerases with single-molecule real-time (SMRT) DNA sequencing, 26 or by the introduction and sequencing of an additional unnatural base pair at the lesion sites that can be directly sequenced with the α-hemolysin nanopore system 27 . However, considering the high error rates of both these methods and the technical challenge when measuring higher lesion numbers, to date they provide a tool for the direct study of several DNA lesions, but are not well suited for the analysis of ultra-rare sequence variants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%