2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(02)00139-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of distinct antibody epitopes and mimotopes from a peptide array of 5520 randomly generated sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be very useful if the peptide sequences identified in the immunosignaturing experiments could be used to identify the immunogenic epitopes in a pathogen or an autoantigen. Some preliminary use of random peptide arrays for epitope mapping was done by Reinke et al, but required subsequent rounds of mutational analysis of the peptides to hone in on the epitope sequence (13). However, it may be possible to use a more sophisticated bioinformatics approach to infer the epitope from these loosely related sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be very useful if the peptide sequences identified in the immunosignaturing experiments could be used to identify the immunogenic epitopes in a pathogen or an autoantigen. Some preliminary use of random peptide arrays for epitope mapping was done by Reinke et al, but required subsequent rounds of mutational analysis of the peptides to hone in on the epitope sequence (13). However, it may be possible to use a more sophisticated bioinformatics approach to infer the epitope from these loosely related sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we examined the antigenic peptide sequences in SeV-NP. SPOT peptide arrays have been successfully used for the screening of antibody epitopes [13,28,29]. We have also identified B-cell epitopes in the nucleoprotein of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) using a SPOT peptide array and developed an ELISA using antigenic peptides derived from the nucleoprotein of MHV for serological diagnosis [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although well located in the antibody paratope, one SCR (Phe 32 from the heavy chain) belonging to group 3 points in a direction opposite to the main orientation of the CD4-binding pocket and was not confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis. Finally, group 4 SCR (Trp 36 and Cys 88 from the light chain and Cys 92 and Tyr 103 from the heavy chain) are clearly not involved in CD4 interaction because an alanine mutation in their Fab fragments did not affect CD4 binding, and they showed a side chain inaccessible to the solvent (Cys 92 , Trp 36 , and Cys 88 ) and/or were at a distance from the CD4-binding pocket, as for Tyr 102 (Fig. 7).…”
Section: Positioning Critical Residues On a Computer Model Of The Varmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete paratope binds the antigen with high affinity, but individual binding sites from each CDR, corresponding to a peptide sequence, are probably characterized by a "degenerated" weak antigen interaction, which is much more difficult to identify. The Spot method can overcome such difficulty because high peptide density at each spot, in the range of 200 -500 nmol/cm 2 (35), coupled with a very sensitive electrochemiluminescence detection system facilitates identification of weak binding peptides due to increased avidity for the probed antigen (36). In addition, several studies have demonstrated that some local flexibility contributes to antigen/antibody recognition, leading to conformational adaptation (37)(38)(39)(40).…”
Section: Positioning Critical Residues On a Computer Model Of The Varmentioning
confidence: 99%