2021
DOI: 10.3390/plants10102107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Differential Drought Response Mechanisms in Medicago sativa subsp. sativa and falcata through Comparative Assessments at the Physiological, Biochemical, and Transcriptional Levels

Abstract: Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is an extensively grown perennial forage legume, and although it is relatively drought tolerant, it consumes high amounts of water and depends upon irrigation in many regions. Given the progressive decline in water available for irrigation, as well as an escalation in climate change-related droughts, there is a critical need to develop alfalfa cultivars with improved drought resilience. M. sativa subsp. falcata is a close relative of the predominantly cultivated M. sativa subsp. sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This improvement in drought tolerance across SPL8-gRNA1 genotypes does not appear to be a direct result of decreased water loss from their leaves ( Figure 7 ). However, it is possible that reduced leaf size, which is known to be associated with superior drought tolerance in plants ( Quan et al, 2016 ; Singer et al, 2021b ), could be contributing to an overall reduction in water loss at the plant level. Intriguingly, enhancements in drought tolerance in RNAi alfalfa genotypes in which other SPL genes were down-regulated have been suggested to occur, at least in part, through the up-regulation of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes, thus resulting in an increased accumulation of this secondary metabolite and a consequent enhancement in ROS scavenging capacity ( Gou et al, 2018 ; Feyissa et al, 2019 ; Hanly et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This improvement in drought tolerance across SPL8-gRNA1 genotypes does not appear to be a direct result of decreased water loss from their leaves ( Figure 7 ). However, it is possible that reduced leaf size, which is known to be associated with superior drought tolerance in plants ( Quan et al, 2016 ; Singer et al, 2021b ), could be contributing to an overall reduction in water loss at the plant level. Intriguingly, enhancements in drought tolerance in RNAi alfalfa genotypes in which other SPL genes were down-regulated have been suggested to occur, at least in part, through the up-regulation of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes, thus resulting in an increased accumulation of this secondary metabolite and a consequent enhancement in ROS scavenging capacity ( Gou et al, 2018 ; Feyissa et al, 2019 ; Hanly et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detached leaf water loss assays were carried out essentially as described previously ( Singer et al, 2021b ) using fully expanded trifoliate leaves (third from the shoot tip) from eight biological replicate plants of each SPL8-gRNA1 genotype (two leaves per plant; sixteen replicates total for each) and seventeen biological replicate control plants (derived from three independent transformants with two leaves sampled per plant; thirty-four replicates total) under well-watered conditions. Assays were carried out by weighing leaves immediately upon harvest (W initial ), placing them on a benchtop, and then weighing every 30 min for 240 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ascertaining the DEGs that change upon water stress in alfalfa is of crucial in understanding the genetic base of drought tolerance. In alfalfa, although drought-responsive DEGs have been reported in previous studies ( Ma et al., 2021 ; Singer et al., 2021 ), there were some limitations due to the lack of a reference genome. The release of a high-quality alfalfa reference genome has given new power to transcriptional analysis ( Chen et al., 2020b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…‘Beaver’ and ‘PI 641,381’, appeared morphologically similar overall, and no significant differences were noted between genotypes in terms of plant height, aboveground biomass, or root length. ‘PI 641,381’ had a significant reduction in leaf area compared to 'Beaver' [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sativa subsp. falcata accession PI 641,381) was performed [ 37 ]. Significant difference was noted between genotypes in terms of leaf size, while they had no difference in plant height and biomass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%