2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69342-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of diagnostic markers for tuberculosis by proteomic fingerprinting of serum

Abstract: The potential biomarkers for tuberculosis that we identified through proteomic fingerprinting and pattern recognition have a plausible biological connection with the disease and could be used to develop new diagnostic tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
166
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
166
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence suggesting that it could be a powerful tool for characterizing the proteome of different tissues and identifying potential biomarkers for various diseases, including cancer. [15][16][17][18] At the same time, great concerns have also been raised regarding its reproducibility and other instrumental and technical limitations. 19,20 In the present study, we sought to determine whether serum protein expression profiling with surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry platform could be used to search for potential disease-and therapy-associated markers for MDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence suggesting that it could be a powerful tool for characterizing the proteome of different tissues and identifying potential biomarkers for various diseases, including cancer. [15][16][17][18] At the same time, great concerns have also been raised regarding its reproducibility and other instrumental and technical limitations. 19,20 In the present study, we sought to determine whether serum protein expression profiling with surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry platform could be used to search for potential disease-and therapy-associated markers for MDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteomic profiling by mass spectrometry or protein chip technology allows for nontargeted screening of large numbers of peptides between TB patients and controls. Proteomic fingerprinting of serum for host markers identified three markers (transthyretin, C-reactive protein [CRP], and neopterin) that could discriminate with high accuracy between TB patients and controls with other infectious and inflammatory conditions (Agranoff et al 2006). Similarly, serum proteomic profiles could differentiate sputum smear-negative and smear-positive TB patients from controls with reasonable accuracy (Liu et al 2010).…”
Section: Untargeted Approaches and New Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results can be prioritized based on cross-validation, and only those that meet a preset threshold of predictive ability are considered potential 'true positives.' Crossvalidation methods have been widely used over the last decade in genomic, 41,42 metabolomic, 43 proteomic, 44,45 and transcriptomic 46 -48 studies as a method for discriminating between true associations and false-positive associations.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%