2011
DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.91355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of deletions and duplications in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene and female carrier status in western India using combined methods of multiplex polymerase chain reaction and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

Abstract: Combining the two techniques, mPCR followed by MLPA assay, has enabled more accurate detection and extent of deletions and duplications which otherwise would have remained unidentified, thereby increasing the mutation pick up rate. These findings have also allowed prediction of expected phenotype. Determining carrier status has a considerable significance in estimating the risk in future pregnancies and prenatal testing options to limit the birth of affected individuals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of 41 patients, 14 patients (34.1%) showed deletion, which is much lower than the proportion of deletions reported in different population of India using same methodology (multiplex PCR method). There is a wide variation in reported frequency of deletion in various parts of India and it ranges from 62.1% to 74% (8)(9)(10). Such wide variation in deletion rate is attributed to population based differences in mutations of dystrophin gene which could be due to accumulation of differences in intronic sequences and their distribution of differences over a period of time as a consequence of genetic drift.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of 41 patients, 14 patients (34.1%) showed deletion, which is much lower than the proportion of deletions reported in different population of India using same methodology (multiplex PCR method). There is a wide variation in reported frequency of deletion in various parts of India and it ranges from 62.1% to 74% (8)(9)(10). Such wide variation in deletion rate is attributed to population based differences in mutations of dystrophin gene which could be due to accumulation of differences in intronic sequences and their distribution of differences over a period of time as a consequence of genetic drift.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings have also allowed prediction of expected phenotype. Determining carrier status has a considerable significance in estimating the risk in future pregnancies and prenatal testing options to limit the birth of affected individuals [27]. With the possibility that exon skipping techniques may help in some of these children as a therapeutic option, it becomes important that the borders of the deletions are clear and this is possible only by analyzing all the 79 exons in the DMD gene using MLPA technique.…”
Section: Genetics and Patho-physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiplex ligationdependent probe amplification (MLPA) and microarraybased comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) are superior techniques to multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting large deletions/duplications in DMD. The MLPA and aCGH allow the identification of a greater number of large deletions, and detect large duplications and provide a better estimation of mutation breakpoints than multiplex PCR (Level of evidence: 1B, Class of Recommendation: A) 12,[17][18][19][20] . Special care should be taken when a single exon deletion is found on MLPA analysis.…”
Section: Diagnosis Confirmationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of choice will depend on the identified mutation in the index case, generally MLPA or aCGH for large deletions/duplications and Sanger sequencing for point mutations, small deletions or insertions and splice site mutations (Level of evidence: 2B, Class of Recommendation: B) 18,19,20 . It is important to emphasize that multiplex PCR cannot detect heterozygous carriers for large deletions or duplications and, therefore, it is not recommended for carrier detection 12 .…”
Section: Carriers' Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation