2016
DOI: 10.1177/0954406216656885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of dangerous hoisting loads based on vibration characteristics

Abstract: The dynamical behaviors of steel ropes and containers caused by different dangerous hoisting loads are theoretically and experimentally investigated to improve the hoisting safety in coal mines. Subsequently, the identification method is studied. The modal analysis technique based on Ritz Series and the Dempster–Shafer evidence theory is respectively employed during the study on vibration and identification. The vibration characteristics are apparently different with different categories and severities of dang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency components and maximum frequency ranges of the bump and clearance faults are similar, and the detailed differences on a small time scale at defect points cannot be depicted in Figure 10b,c. Besides this, the bright areas vary with lifting speed [28], lifting load [29], and fault severity [13], which confuses the time-frequency analysis and makes it difficult to classify bump and clearance faults from time-frequency representations. Salvador et al [14] successfully identified diverse rail faults through recognizing fault characteristic frequencies in an STFT spectrogram; the key point is that the frequencies excited by different defects are known in advance and the frequency ranges are isolated, whereas the frequencies excited by bump and clearance faults in this paper under different operating conditions are unknown and may be overlapped.…”
Section: Normal Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency components and maximum frequency ranges of the bump and clearance faults are similar, and the detailed differences on a small time scale at defect points cannot be depicted in Figure 10b,c. Besides this, the bright areas vary with lifting speed [28], lifting load [29], and fault severity [13], which confuses the time-frequency analysis and makes it difficult to classify bump and clearance faults from time-frequency representations. Salvador et al [14] successfully identified diverse rail faults through recognizing fault characteristic frequencies in an STFT spectrogram; the key point is that the frequencies excited by different defects are known in advance and the frequency ranges are isolated, whereas the frequencies excited by bump and clearance faults in this paper under different operating conditions are unknown and may be overlapped.…”
Section: Normal Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al [6] realized the fault diagnosis of guide rail faults by analysing vibration acceleration signals based on a dynamic time warping strategy. Ma et al [7] proposed a Ritz series and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory-based method to identify dangerous hoisting loads by using vibration characteristics. Xue et al [8] developed a hybrid method consisting of improved permutation entropy, ensemble empirical mode decomposition, a support vector machine, and a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm to analyse mine hoist vibration signals for rope tension fault diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ren et al [17] proposed a new type of skip load identification method based on the mapping relationship between speed and load of hoist. Ma et al [18] found that the vibration characteristics of the steel wire rope under different loads of the hoist were significantly different, and the different dynamic behaviors of the steel wire rope could be used as the basis for load monitoring. Xu et al [19] proposed to convert the wire rope tension measurement into pressure measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%