2011
DOI: 10.1080/19424280.2011.639807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of critical traction values for maximum athletic performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results highlighted that outsole design of futsal shoes has a substantial impact on its traction properties. In particular, critical traction coefficients of the multi-studded outsole design (1.26 for FTT; 2.10 for STT) were distinctively higher compared to the values previously reported for athletic performances (around 0.82) [12]. This finding might partially explain a higher risk of injury of futsal compared to soccer [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 36%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results highlighted that outsole design of futsal shoes has a substantial impact on its traction properties. In particular, critical traction coefficients of the multi-studded outsole design (1.26 for FTT; 2.10 for STT) were distinctively higher compared to the values previously reported for athletic performances (around 0.82) [12]. This finding might partially explain a higher risk of injury of futsal compared to soccer [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 36%
“…Despite the very little information in previous reports relating to futsal shoe traction aspect [9], there have been several previous studies which quantified the traction coefficient between the shoe outsole-playing surface in soccer and other sports [10][11][12]. They reported critical traction coefficient for maximum athletic performance was around 0.82 [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The available traction quantified under this protocol was a traction coefficient of 1.13. It has been shown that beyond a traction coefficient of 0.82, available traction no longer constrains sprinting performance along a curve of 2.3m radius (Luo and Stefanyshyn, 2011). The footwear outsole was cleaned between trials and the laboratory floor was cleaned between conditions.…”
Section: Set-up and Equipmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent any confounding effects caused by differences in shoe-ground traction, all subjects used the same pair of athletic shoes (model Yushuai IV, Li Ning Company, Beijing, China) that provided sufficiently high available traction on the laboratory floor. Mechanical traction tests of the current shoe-floor interface were conducted using a previously validated protocol (Luo and Stefanyshyn, 2011). The available traction quantified under this protocol was a traction coefficient of 1.13.…”
Section: Set-up and Equipmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%