2011
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2011.00035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Critical Molecular Components in a Multiscale Cancer Model Based on the Integration of Monte Carlo, Resampling, and ANOVA

Abstract: To date, parameters defining biological properties in multiscale disease models are commonly obtained from a variety of sources. It is thus important to examine the influence of parameter perturbations on system behavior, rather than to limit the model to a specific set of parameters. Such sensitivity analysis can be used to investigate how changes in input parameters affect model outputs. However, multiscale cancer models require special attention because they generally take longer to run than does a series o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each parameter, we created 11 variations, through a range of +/−50% of the parameter's standard value and with a 10.0% variation interval. Note that a 50% variation has been assumed as reasonable in systems modeling analysis [1416]. Accordingly, this generated a total of (11 × 11 =) 121 parameter variation pairs, covering a wider range of parameter space.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each parameter, we created 11 variations, through a range of +/−50% of the parameter's standard value and with a 10.0% variation interval. Note that a 50% variation has been assumed as reasonable in systems modeling analysis [1416]. Accordingly, this generated a total of (11 × 11 =) 121 parameter variation pairs, covering a wider range of parameter space.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These efforts have produced encouraging results in understanding cancer drug resistance, as seen in other research areas such as identification of novel therapeutic targets [7678], development of alternative therapeutic strategies [79], and prediction of surgical volume and tumor size [80]. Eventually, these data-driven models could help improve patient outcomes and reduce costs of cancer treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we use a 'random sampling' of input parameters to render the large number of variation combinations computationally manageable. Specifically, as implemented in [9], we use the Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) method to generate 2000 random sets of parameter values, and thus 2000 sets of simulation results will be generated correspondingly. For simplicity, we call each set of parameter values along with the corresponding two tumour output values an 'observation'.…”
Section: Gsa Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSA methods have also been applied to systems biology models [4,[6][7][8], but most of them focus on the analysis of signalling pathways. To assess the context-dependent relationship between different biological scales of interest, we have previously provided an applicable GSA strategy based on the integration of Monte Carlo and resampling methods as well as the repeated use of analysis of variance (ANOVA) [9]. Read et al [10] also developed a GSA method based on statistical techniques to link simulation results back into the original biology domain in order to determine the confidence of the simulation-derived predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%