1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00105-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of contamination sources of Bacillus cereus in pasteurized milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
1
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
45
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to one isolate of l. monocytogenes, one isolate of stx2 positive e. coli and one isolate of O103 e. coli found in raw meat intended for sale, the meat products were generally more frequently (Table 3) contaminated with diarrhogenic enterotoxin positive B. cereus, which was typically isolated from the heat-treated products. It is known that heat treatment, which eliminates the other species of microflora, can facilitate spore germination and cell multiplication of B. cereus (Lin et al 1998;Ray & Bhunia 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to one isolate of l. monocytogenes, one isolate of stx2 positive e. coli and one isolate of O103 e. coli found in raw meat intended for sale, the meat products were generally more frequently (Table 3) contaminated with diarrhogenic enterotoxin positive B. cereus, which was typically isolated from the heat-treated products. It is known that heat treatment, which eliminates the other species of microflora, can facilitate spore germination and cell multiplication of B. cereus (Lin et al 1998;Ray & Bhunia 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contamination of pasteurized milk has been mainly traced to raw milk (Lin et al 1998;Huck et al 2007;Banyko and Vyletelova 2009) and/or equipment surfaces. The role of processing equipment as a reservoir for B. cereus milk recontamination is well documented (Te Giffel et al 1997;Svensson et al 1999Svensson et al , 2000Svensson et al , 2004Schlegelova et al 2010) notably post-pasteurization contamination (Eneroth et al 2001;Sharma and Anand 2002;Salustiano et al 2009).…”
Section: Milk and Milk Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practice of dry wiping teats to remove debris prior to cluster attachment was also associated with lowering the presumptive Bacillus cereus count in bulk tank milk when animals were managed outdoors . B. cereus s. l. are specific thermoduric bacteria that are resistant to pasteurisation (Granum, 2005) and have been isolated from pasteurised dairy products (Becker et al, 1994;Lin et al, 1998;Larsen and Jorgensen, 1999) and, therefore, are of particular interest to the Irish dairy industry. B. cereus s. l. is abundant in soil; therefore, removing dry soil and dirt from contaminated of teats) (>30% of surface area caked with dirt), based on the scorecard developed by Schreiner and Ruegg (2003), were washed and dried before cluster application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%