2021
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2021.3059849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Complex Mixtures for Raman Spectroscopy Using a Novel Scheme Based on a New Multi-Label Deep Neural Network

Abstract: With noisy environment caused by fluoresence and additive white noise as well as complicated spectrum fingerprints, the identification of complex mixture materials remains a major challenge in Raman spectroscopy application. In this paper, we propose a new scheme based on a constant wavelet transform (CWT) and a deep network for classifying complex mixture. The scheme first transforms the noisy Raman spectrum to a two-dimensional scale map using CWT. A multi-label deep neural network model (MDNN) is then appli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the model, we need to perform a detailed analysis of each category. Therefore, we need to count true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), and false positive (FN) [ 33 ]. Test accuracy: the proportion of samples correctly predicted to the total samples Precision: the ratio of true positive predictions to total positive predictions Recall: Ratio of true positive to the total observation made by the proposed model F1 Score: It is the harmonic mean of precision and recall Confusion matrix: It is the measurement of the performance of the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the model, we need to perform a detailed analysis of each category. Therefore, we need to count true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), and false positive (FN) [ 33 ]. Test accuracy: the proportion of samples correctly predicted to the total samples Precision: the ratio of true positive predictions to total positive predictions Recall: Ratio of true positive to the total observation made by the proposed model F1 Score: It is the harmonic mean of precision and recall Confusion matrix: It is the measurement of the performance of the model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the model, we need to perform a detailed analysis of each category. Therefore, we need to count true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false positives [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By observing the results in Figures 7 and 8, the 2-layer unidirectional LSTM has 768,000 more parameters than the 1-layer bidirectional LSTM, and the accuracy rate is also reduced by 0.4%. Therefore, the performance of the 1-layer bidirectional LSTM is used to compare with others networks [34,35]. layer with bidirectional and 2 layers with unidirectional architectures have relatively high accuracy outcomes.…”
Section: Type 4 Bidirectional Multi-layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of Section 3.1 is based on the model of CNN in the proposed CCLN using [15]. In order to consider the utility of using the general network architecture, this study evaluates several general CNN models, including VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, DenseNet121 and MobileNet [34,35]. Evaluating the impact of transfer learning on overall performance is as following.…”
Section: The Comparison Of Various Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%