1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02165.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of common dermatophytes (Trichophyton,Microsporum,Epidermophyton) using polymerase chain reactions

Abstract: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprinting detected DNA polymorphisms among frequently isolated species and strains of the genera Trichophyton, Microsporum and Epidermophyton. The patterns generated by this DNA-based method permitted species and strains to be identified. The conventional methods to identify dermatophytes rely on the expression of characteristic morphological features, as well as several physiological properties. Identification is often delayed or problematic because isolates may be slow to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(29 reference statements)
2
78
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Our results fitted well with the known predilection of dermatophyte species for certain body areas (De Hoog et al, 1998;Fumeaux et al, 2004;Graser et al, 1998Graser et al, , 1999aKardjeva et al, 2006;Ninet et al, 2003;Summerbell et al, 2002;Weitzman & Summerbell, 1995). Clade I human isolates Table 1) were isolated from tinea pedis, like the neotype of T.…”
Section: T T G a C T G T G T G T T T T A T A C A A T G G G A -G T Isupporting
confidence: 74%
“…1). Our results fitted well with the known predilection of dermatophyte species for certain body areas (De Hoog et al, 1998;Fumeaux et al, 2004;Graser et al, 1998Graser et al, , 1999aKardjeva et al, 2006;Ninet et al, 2003;Summerbell et al, 2002;Weitzman & Summerbell, 1995). Clade I human isolates Table 1) were isolated from tinea pedis, like the neotype of T.…”
Section: T T G a C T G T G T G T T T T A T A C A A T G G G A -G T Isupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The conventional methods to identify dermatophytes rely on the expression of characteristic phenotypic characters. Identification is often delayed or problematic because isolates may be slow to form conidia or produce atypical microscopic structures or colony appearances that require the assistance of an experienced mycologist who specializes in dermatophytes 24 . Molecular techniques are more beneficial for dermatophyte identification as they are objective, unequivocal, rapid and more sensitive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to some limitations in traditional methods such as the high degree of phenoltypic similarity between these relative species identification and time-consumption, many isolates reveal unusual characteristics (Weiyzman et al, 1995;Graser et al, 2008;Shehata et al, 2008;De Baere et al, 2010). To overcome these problems, in recent years, molecular marker approaches relying on genetic makeup are regarded as useful in the exact and rapid recognition of dermatophytes Kanbe et al, 2003;Liu et al, 2000;Graser et al, 1998). During the present work, three molecular marker systems based on PCR were applied to study the genetic relationships among 18 selected isolates of dermatophytes (12 isolates) and yeasts (6 isolates).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%