2019
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of chemoresistance‐related mRNAs based on gemcitabine‐resistant pancreatic cancer cell lines

Abstract: Gemcitabine (GEM) alone and GEM-based chemotherapy are the preferred regimens for treating advanced unresectable and metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). However,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(66 reference statements)
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, SRSF3 could control the PDGFRB pathway indirectly, by modulating the alternative splicing of five potential regulators of PDGFRB expression such as TFDP1 , CUX1 , PRDM10 , TEAD4 and TP73 . Previously, altered TFDP1 , CUX1 and PRDM10 splicing has been reported to generate variants that act as super enhancers of several oncogenes and cell cycle checkpoint genes ( Rong Zeng et al , 2000 ; Sansregret and Nepveu, 2008 ; Cadieux et al , 2009 ; Park and Kim, 2010 ; Hulea and Nepveu, 2012 ; Ramdzan and Nepveu, 2014 ; Lu et al , 2016 ; Kaur et al , 2018 ; Zhang et al , 2018 ; Chen et al , 2019 a ; Zhou et al , 2020 ), while altered TEAD4 splicing events could result in VEGF inhibition ( Appukuttan et al , 2012 ; Qi et al , 2016 ; Xu et al , 2018 ). Most interestingly, some splicing variants of TP73 (the only factor reported as a PDGFRB regulator from the five identified) can distinctly act as tumour suppressors, arresting the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis ( Liu et al , 2004 ; Jancalek, 2014 ; Vikhreva et al , 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, SRSF3 could control the PDGFRB pathway indirectly, by modulating the alternative splicing of five potential regulators of PDGFRB expression such as TFDP1 , CUX1 , PRDM10 , TEAD4 and TP73 . Previously, altered TFDP1 , CUX1 and PRDM10 splicing has been reported to generate variants that act as super enhancers of several oncogenes and cell cycle checkpoint genes ( Rong Zeng et al , 2000 ; Sansregret and Nepveu, 2008 ; Cadieux et al , 2009 ; Park and Kim, 2010 ; Hulea and Nepveu, 2012 ; Ramdzan and Nepveu, 2014 ; Lu et al , 2016 ; Kaur et al , 2018 ; Zhang et al , 2018 ; Chen et al , 2019 a ; Zhou et al , 2020 ), while altered TEAD4 splicing events could result in VEGF inhibition ( Appukuttan et al , 2012 ; Qi et al , 2016 ; Xu et al , 2018 ). Most interestingly, some splicing variants of TP73 (the only factor reported as a PDGFRB regulator from the five identified) can distinctly act as tumour suppressors, arresting the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis ( Liu et al , 2004 ; Jancalek, 2014 ; Vikhreva et al , 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it was shown that cells treated with either 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine increased ORAI1 and STIM1 expression as well as SOC entry suggesting that ORAI1 and STIM1 confer resistance to chemotherapy, probably through the increase of SOC entry (Kondratska et al, 2014). More recently, STIM1 was found to be involved in gemcitabine resistance in PDAC (Zhou et al, 2020). The transcriptome sequencing analysis in established gemcitabine resistant PDAC cell lines, showed that STIM1 was significantly upregulated in the gemcitabine resistant cell lines, compared to the parental cell line (Zhou et al, 2020).…”
Section: Therapeutic Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, STIM1 was found to be involved in gemcitabine resistance in PDAC (Zhou et al, 2020). The transcriptome sequencing analysis in established gemcitabine resistant PDAC cell lines, showed that STIM1 was significantly upregulated in the gemcitabine resistant cell lines, compared to the parental cell line (Zhou et al, 2020). Among the chloride channels, knockdown of TMEM16J provided an additive effect on inhibiting proliferation upon treatment with gemcitabine and erlotinib, suggesting that a TMEM16J inhibitor can help to prevent gemcitabine resistance associated with the prolonged use of gemcitabine (Jun et al, 2017).…”
Section: Therapeutic Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] In the gemcitabine-resistant PDAC models we developed, we observed a tendency to mesenchymal transformation together with increased growth compared with the parental cell lines. These morphological and growth changes, as well as cell cycle arrest in G1 phase, have been already related to drug resistance by Zhou et al, 23 with different features according to the cell type. Moreover, two studies indicated that c-MET signaling and STAT3 activation play an important role in acquired resistance to gemcitabine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%