The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.03.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of CELSR1 as a susceptibility gene for ischemic stroke in Japanese individuals by a genome-wide association study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
65
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This report constitutes the first replication study of the Yamada et al [1] GWAS and confirmed that CELSR1 is a stroke risk factor in a Portuguese IS case-control dataset. Interestingly, even though the characteristics of the Japanese and Portuguese cohorts, as well as the rs6007897 and rs4044210 frequencies, are very different (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This report constitutes the first replication study of the Yamada et al [1] GWAS and confirmed that CELSR1 is a stroke risk factor in a Portuguese IS case-control dataset. Interestingly, even though the characteristics of the Japanese and Portuguese cohorts, as well as the rs6007897 and rs4044210 frequencies, are very different (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…SNPs rs6007897 and rs4044210 are associated with ischemic stroke in allelic, unadjusted and adjusted (for hypertension, diabetes, and ever smoking) genotypic tests of association (Table 2), with an odds ratio and 95%CI for the minor allele (A) of 0.76[0.61-0.94] and 0.78[0.63-0.96], respectively. As observed in the Japanese population (r 2 = 0.96) [1], these two SNPs were in very high, but not complete, linkage disequilibrium (LD) in our dataset (r 2 = 0.91). Furthermore, we also confirmed the association of the two most common haplotypes defined by these two polymorphisms ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations