2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01498-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of cell types in multiplexed in situ images by combining protein expression and spatial information using CELESTA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly, current computational approaches represent a bottleneck, as significant manual operation is needed to annotate and validate cell types, which is particularly relevant when handling large tissue areas with millions of cells. Further improvements of computational approaches will enable a broader application of highly multiplexed immunofluorescence across large clinical cohorts [68][69][70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, current computational approaches represent a bottleneck, as significant manual operation is needed to annotate and validate cell types, which is particularly relevant when handling large tissue areas with millions of cells. Further improvements of computational approaches will enable a broader application of highly multiplexed immunofluorescence across large clinical cohorts [68][69][70].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our tool has a great value in transferring annotations across levels of granularity to a new biological context and discovering novel biological states that have not been characterized in previous experiments. The annotation transfer methodology in STELLAR distinguishes it from previous spatial annotation tools that rely on predefined marker genes that define cell types [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While CELESTA tool has successfully avoided post hoc cluster reannotation for multiplexed in situ images [16], it is reliant upon the prior human supervision provided in the form of the set of marker genes of expected cell types which is often challenging to define for a new dataset. As new spatial datasets are being generated [17][18][19][20][21], there is a necessity for computational methods that simultaneously leverage molecular features and additional spatial context of cells while at the same time minimize manual human annotation effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphology metrics cell size, solidity and eccentricity were z-scored and used as initial quality control steps to remove segmentation artefacts. Cell phenotyping was performed using CELESTA on each with a custom generated cell expression matrix 57 57 . The phenotype assignments were qualitatively validated by plotting them in their original spatial location and comparing the patterns to the images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%