2016
DOI: 10.21276/ijmrp.2016.2.6.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Candida Species in the Clinical Laboratory: A Review of Conventional, Commercial and Molecular Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 6 ] Emergence of drug-resistant strains of Candida has highlighted the need for reliable methods of candidial isolation and identification. [ 16 ] Thus, the above study was undertaken to comparatively evaluate the phenotypic variation of Candida species in patients of OLP and OLL with healthy individuals using indirect microscopic examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[ 6 ] Emergence of drug-resistant strains of Candida has highlighted the need for reliable methods of candidial isolation and identification. [ 16 ] Thus, the above study was undertaken to comparatively evaluate the phenotypic variation of Candida species in patients of OLP and OLL with healthy individuals using indirect microscopic examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On performing GT test for differentiation into C. albicans and non C. albicans species,[ 16 ] the frequency of C. albicans was higher in control group and non C. albicans species in study (OLP + OLL) group. To the best of our knowledge, no other studies show an increased number of non C. albicans in OLP and OLL as compared to healthy controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The API 20 C AUX system (Bio-Merieux, France) was also used for differentiation of Candida spp. The cupules turbidity was identified after incubation at 37°C for 24−72 h by using the analytical profile index and reading them as compared to the growth control (0 cupule) 18 .…”
Section: Api 20 C Aux Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%