2018
DOI: 10.1002/sim.8027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of cancer omics commonality and difference via community fusion

Abstract: The analysis of cancer omics data is a "classic" problem; however, it still remains challenging. Advancing from early studies that are mostly focused on a single type of cancer, some recent studies have analyzed data on multiple "related" cancer types/subtypes, examined their commonality and difference, and led to insightful findings. In this article, we consider the analysis of multiple omics datasets, with each dataset on one type/subtype of "related" cancers. A Community Fusion (CoFu) approach is developed,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the limited sample size, we select a subset of “interesting” genes for analysis. In particular, in a recent study, 26 a gene expression network is first constructed, and the network communities (also referred to as modules) are identified. This analysis accounts for the community structure in regularized regression, and suggests that 126 genes are potentially associated with Breslow thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the limited sample size, we select a subset of “interesting” genes for analysis. In particular, in a recent study, 26 a gene expression network is first constructed, and the network communities (also referred to as modules) are identified. This analysis accounts for the community structure in regularized regression, and suggests that 126 genes are potentially associated with Breslow thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted with significantly inferior performance, the meta‐PLS method is not considered, leading to a total of six methods. In Figure 1, we show representative analysis results (for communities 3, 5, and 42) ‐ we refer to the literature 26 for detailed information on these gene communities. Here each row corresponds to one dataset/stage, and each column corresponds to one community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One goal of the study was to investigate genetic and environmental effects on the development of melanoma. For patients in different clinical stages, genes can have different effects on the Breslow thickness, which is a continuous variable and has been extensively used as a prognostic indicator for melanoma . Therefore, subjects with the three stages should not be analyzed as a single population, which motivates us to develop an appropriate analysis method to handle such differences across multiple datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus of interest to develop the proposed method beyond the penalization one. 16 The rest of the article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we describe the data and model settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%