“…In several studies, including a meta‐analysis (Van Snellenberg, Torres, & Thornton, 2006), a region of interest (ROI) analysis was performed specifically for DLPFC and found stronger fMRI response (Karlsgodt et al, 2009; Manoach et al, 2000; Potkin et al, 2009; Van Snellenberg et al, 2016), weaker fMRI response (Fan et al, 2019; Kaminski et al, 2020; Menon, Anagnoson, Mathalon, Glover, & Pfefferbaum, 2001; Pu et al, 2019) or no significant difference in fMRI response (Van Snellenberg et al, 2006) in patients with SZ compared to HC. Additionally, using independent component analysis (ICA), several fMRI studies of WM tasks have revealed significant alterations of fMRI response in patients with SZ relative to HC, which are either correlated or anti‐correlated with WM performance, including stronger fMRI response in bilateral superior frontal gyrus (SFG), PCC, insula, superior temporal gyrus (STG), inferior temporal gyrus, precuneus, parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, putamen and cerebellum, left DLPFC, cingulate gyrus and inferior parietal lobule (IPL) (Chatterjee et al, 2019; Kim et al, 2009), and weaker fMRI response in bilateral dentate gyrus and cerebellum (Kim et al, 2009). These findings suggest that the aforementioned brain regions may be implicated in the neurobiological mechanisms underlying impairment of WM in SZ (Kim et al, 2009).…”