1995
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1995.0217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of boundary conditions as a part of model correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hagedorn [16] proposed a method that uses measured modal data to identify the properties of the boundary conditions of a structure. A boundary identification method using neural networks was proposed by Takahashi and Chishaki [17].…”
Section: Identification Of the Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hagedorn [16] proposed a method that uses measured modal data to identify the properties of the boundary conditions of a structure. A boundary identification method using neural networks was proposed by Takahashi and Chishaki [17].…”
Section: Identification Of the Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In equation (13), one is required to calculate the derivatives of the determinant of a N K ;N K matrix with respect to each of the sti!ness unknowns. As detailed in Appendix A, they can be directly obtained from…”
Section: A New Formulation For Identification Of Joint Stiffnessesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of the boundary conditions from experimental data is an effective solution to improve the modeling accuracy. Pabst and Hagedorn [6] proposed an inverse method to identify the boundary stiffness and damping parameters of a visco-elastically clamped beam by using modal data. Yang et al [7] constructed a numerical model to solve multi-variables inverse problems for a beam with elastic boundary support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%