2003
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2033602100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of biomarkers for ovarian cancer using strong anion-exchange ProteinChips: Potential use in diagnosis and prognosis

Abstract: One hundred eighty-four serum samples from patients with ovarian cancer (n ‫؍‬ 109), patients with benign tumors (n ‫؍‬ 19), and healthy donors (n ‫؍‬ 56) were analyzed on strong anion-exchange surfaces using surface-enhanced laser desorption͞ionization )], 6 of 6 low malignant potential, 5 of the 6 benign tumors, and 9 of 10 normal patient samples. In conclusion, we have discovered three ovarian cancer biomarker protein panels that, when used together, effectively distinguished serum samples from healthy cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

4
146
1
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
146
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Multivariate analysis can then be used to determine whether the intensities of the peaks in the SELDI spectra of different patient groups possess discriminatory ability. Studies have suggested the possible utility of SELDI analysis in diagnosing ovarian (Petricoin et al, 2002;Kozak et al, 2003), prostate Qu et al, 2002;Banez et al, 2003), breast (Li et al, 2002), bladder (Vlahou et al, 2001), hepatic (Poon et al, 2003;Ward et al, 2006) and pancreatic cancer using serum. Concerns with several aspects of this approach have been raised, including potential bias in sample collection protocols, accuracy/ resolution of the PBS IIc mass spectrometer employed in SELDI analysis, alignment of the detected peaks and over fitting of the data (Ransohoff, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multivariate analysis can then be used to determine whether the intensities of the peaks in the SELDI spectra of different patient groups possess discriminatory ability. Studies have suggested the possible utility of SELDI analysis in diagnosing ovarian (Petricoin et al, 2002;Kozak et al, 2003), prostate Qu et al, 2002;Banez et al, 2003), breast (Li et al, 2002), bladder (Vlahou et al, 2001), hepatic (Poon et al, 2003;Ward et al, 2006) and pancreatic cancer using serum. Concerns with several aspects of this approach have been raised, including potential bias in sample collection protocols, accuracy/ resolution of the PBS IIc mass spectrometer employed in SELDI analysis, alignment of the detected peaks and over fitting of the data (Ransohoff, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such approach is proteomic profiling (Adam et al, 2002;Li et al, 2002;Kozak et al, 2003;Poon et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2004;Paradis et al, 2005;Schwegler et al, 2005;Yang et al, 2005;Ward et al, 2006a -c). We and other groups have suggested that patients with HCC may express a characteristic protein 'signature' even in the case of small tumours (Poon et al, 2003;Paradis et al, 2005;Schwegler et al, 2005;Ward et al, 2006a -c).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These signatures are customarily detected using Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/ Ionisation (SELDI) technology, which permits the mass spectrum of a specific subset of serum proteins to be compared between cancer and non-cancer patients using various pattern recognition programmes. While there has been considerable controversy about the robustness of this approach, particularly with regard to its reproducibility and the techniques used to validate results (Diamandis, 2004;Petricoin et al, 2004;Ransohoff, 2004), a large body of evidence does suggest that such signatures are detectable (Adam et al, 2002;Li et al, 2002;Kozak et al, 2003;Poon et al, 2003;Chen et al, 2004;Paradis et al, 2005;Schwegler et al, 2005;Yang et al, 2005;Ward et al, 2006a -c), even if clinical utility remains to be convincingly shown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]25 The most interesting discovery of the study was the finding that a SELDI-derived peak (m/z 4,462) was as effective at discriminating cancer from benign serum as the tumor markers CEA or CA19.9, while combining these three serum markers marginally improved classification. Classification could be further improved with data generated from a panel of peaks, suggesting analysis of proteomic profiles, rather than individual proteins, may yield improved diagnostic ability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteomic profiling of serum has been used with a number of other malignancies to discover potential biomarkers. 7,8 In particular, affinity-based arrays-such as the protein chips analyzed via surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-offlight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) used in this study-have been used to successfully identify malignant patterns in serum from ovarian, [9][10][11] pancreatic, [12][13][14] head and neck, 15,16 prostate, 17 transitional cell, 18 renal cell, 19,20 and breast 21 cancers. TOF-MS separates ions derived from proteins or protein fragments that are differentially detected according to their mass-to-charge ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%