2023
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4621570
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Application and Interpretation Errors that Can Occur in Pairwise Meta-Analyses in Systematic Reviews of Interventions: A Systematic Review

Raju Kanukula,
Matthew Page,
Simon Turner
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess heterogeneity, we used the I-squared, Q-test, prediction interval, 35 tau and tau-squared values, 35 avoiding reliance on just a single metric. 36 , 37 I-squared uses a Q-test to inform what portion of the variability in results is attributed to between-study heterogeneity [ Box S1 ]. We explored heterogeneity using subgroup analyses-based on comparator (placebo/standard of care and active antibiotics) and mode of delivery (vaginal or caesarean section).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess heterogeneity, we used the I-squared, Q-test, prediction interval, 35 tau and tau-squared values, 35 avoiding reliance on just a single metric. 36 , 37 I-squared uses a Q-test to inform what portion of the variability in results is attributed to between-study heterogeneity [ Box S1 ]. We explored heterogeneity using subgroup analyses-based on comparator (placebo/standard of care and active antibiotics) and mode of delivery (vaginal or caesarean section).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%