2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10453-015-9363-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of airborne bacteria by 16S rDNA sequencing, MALDI-TOF MS and the MIDI microbial identification system

Abstract: The aim of this study was to collect and identify airborne bacteria in Norway, Sweden and Finland and to compare three different technologies for identifying collected airborne bacterial isolates: the ''gold standard'' method 16S rDNA sequencing, MALDI-TOF MS using the MALDI Biotyper 2.0 and the MIDI Sherlock Ò Microbial Identification System (MIDI MIS system). Airborne bacteria were collected during three different periods from May to October 2009 using air sampling directly on agar plates. A total of 140 iso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at the species level, only 15 (~35%) of the cultures identified coincided with those identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. These findings are in contrast to previous studies of clinically important bacteria where concordant species identifications between MALDI BioTyper and 16S rRNA gene analysis were reported to be in the range 41–92.2% of samples (Mellmann et al, 2008 ; Bizzini et al, 2011 ; Schmitt et al, 2013 ; Cheng et al, 2015 ; Fykse et al, 2015 ; Schulthess et al, 2016 ). This discrepancy is most likely due to the insufficient coverage of bacterial species in the databases.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the species level, only 15 (~35%) of the cultures identified coincided with those identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. These findings are in contrast to previous studies of clinically important bacteria where concordant species identifications between MALDI BioTyper and 16S rRNA gene analysis were reported to be in the range 41–92.2% of samples (Mellmann et al, 2008 ; Bizzini et al, 2011 ; Schmitt et al, 2013 ; Cheng et al, 2015 ; Fykse et al, 2015 ; Schulthess et al, 2016 ). This discrepancy is most likely due to the insufficient coverage of bacterial species in the databases.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…() and Fykse et al . (). The peak lists generated were used directly to obtain matches against the reference library (SARAMIS database).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Storage days with the different letter for the same bacterial group have means that are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) (n = 72). and Fykse et al (2015). The peak lists generated were used directly to obtain matches against the reference library (SARAMIS database).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, matrix-assisted laser-desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) was used for identifying indoor airborne bacteria. Fykse et al (2015) used MALDI-TOF to identify indoor airborne bacteria, and Dybwad et al (2012Dybwad et al ( , 2014 investigated temporal variability of bacteria species in a subway station in Norway. Before MALDI-TOF analysis, colonies were picked with a toothpick and smeared on a steel target plate.…”
Section: Maldi-tof Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%