2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-019-0241-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of advanced spin-driven thermoelectric materials via interpretable machine learning

Abstract: Machine learning is becoming a valuable tool for scientific discovery. Particularly attractive is the application of machine learning methods to the field of materials development, which enables innovations by discovering new and better functional materials. To apply machine learning to actual materials development, close collaboration between scientists and machine learning tools is necessary. However, such collaboration has been so far impeded by the black box nature of many machine learning algorithms. It i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mentality often leads to a challenging interpretation of outputs, which often results into incorporation of noise, and description of spurious contributions as physical phenomena. [33][34][35] This "interpretability" challenge has become a central focus of many recent publications, [36][37][38] and is directly correlated with the ML techniques' strictly mathematical nature: They inherently provide results lacking a physical basis. Traditional approaches to materials science indeed are based on interpretation of correlated datasets through the lens of physical and/or chemical behaviors-aspects fundamentally absent in ML methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mentality often leads to a challenging interpretation of outputs, which often results into incorporation of noise, and description of spurious contributions as physical phenomena. [33][34][35] This "interpretability" challenge has become a central focus of many recent publications, [36][37][38] and is directly correlated with the ML techniques' strictly mathematical nature: They inherently provide results lacking a physical basis. Traditional approaches to materials science indeed are based on interpretation of correlated datasets through the lens of physical and/or chemical behaviors-aspects fundamentally absent in ML methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose combining a simple HTE with HTC and machine learning (ML) for property prediction. ML methods enable rapid analysis of materials big data and have proven to be effective in the development of various materials including potential magnets [13], ferroelectrics [14], superconductors [15] and thermoelectrics [16,17]. We demonstrate that an experimental mapping of Kerr rotation θ K on a composition spread Fe x Co y Ni 1-x-y alloy can be predicted with our proposed method instead of with a difficult and expensive HTE (e.g., a combinatorial SMOKE experiment).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[ 65‐67 ] After that, we can use interpretable ML models to help understanding the real process of material synthesis, especially the knowledge we don't have yet, improve proposed mechanisms by combining with existing theoretical calculation tools, and further propose universal ML application solutions. [ 68 ]…”
Section: Challenges and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%