Identification of Acute Stroke Using Quantified Brain Electrical Activity

Abstract

Objectives: Acute stroke is a leading cause of brain injury and death and requires rapid and accurate diagnosis. Noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) is the first line for diagnosis in the emergency department (ED). Complicating rapid triage are presenting conditions that clinically mimic stroke. There is an extensive literature reporting clinical utility of brain electrical activity in early diagnosis and management of acute stroke. However, existing technologies do not lend themselves to easily acquired rapid evaluation. This investigation used an independently derived classifier algorithm for the identification of traumatic structural brain injury based on brain electrical activity recorded from a reduced frontal montage to explore the potential clinical utility of such an approach in acute stroke assessment.Methods: Adult patients (age 18 to 95 years) presenting with stroke-like and/or altered mental status symptoms were recruited from urban academic EDs as part of a large research study evaluating the clinical utility of quantitative brain electrical activity in acutely brain-injured patients. All patients from the parent study who had confirmed strokes, and a control group of stroke mimics (those with final ED diagnoses of migraine or syncope), were selected for this study. All stroke patients underwent head CT scans. Some patients with negative CTs had further imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ten minutes of electroencephalographic data were acquired on a hand-held device in development, from five frontal electrodes. Data analyses were done offline. A Structural Brain Injury Index (SBII) was derived using an independently developed binary discriminant classification algorithm whose input was specified features of brain electrical activity. The SBII was previously found to have high accuracy in the identification of traumatic brain-injured patients who were found to have brain injury on CT (CT+). This algorithm was applied to patients in this study and used to classify patients as CT+ or not CT+. Performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values (NPV, PPV).Results: Forty-eight stroke patients (31 ischemic and 17 hemorrhagic) and 135 stroke mimic controls were included. Within the ischemic population, approximately half were CT-but later confirmed for stroke with MRI (CT-/MRI+). Sensitivity to stroke was 91.7%, specificity 50.4% (to stroke mimic), NPV 94.4%, and PPV 39.6%. Eighty percent of the CT-/MRI+ ischemic strokes were correctly identified at the time of the CT-scan.Conclusions: Despite a small population and the use of a classifier without the benefit of training on a stroke population, these data suggest that a rapidly acquired, easy-to-use system to assess brain electrical activity at the time of evaluation of acute stroke could be a valuable adjunct to current clinical practice.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2015;22:67-72

A scoping review of pre-hospital technology to assist ambulance personnel with patient diagnosis or stratification during the emergency assessment of suspected stroke

“…ELECTRA-STROKE has yet to report on outcomes. There are alternative electrophysiological devices with intended application to the pre-hospital setting [79][80][81][82] but clinical publications are lacking. Other potential prehospital imaging technologies include Volumetric Integral Phase Shift Spectroscopy (VIPS) by Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Inc., which has been evaluated in hospital but not the pre-hospital setting.…”

When migraine mimics stroke: A systematic review

“…Twenty percent of patients younger than 50 years suffering from a cerebrovascular event are migrainous (70), a percentage that rises to 29% in further younger patients (<35 years (71)). Furthermore, headache is reported in 13% of AIS with a negative brain CT scan in the acute phase (72), 27% of a large cohort of AIS (73), while it characterizes 28% of posterior circulation stroke according to a more recent article (74). Unfortunately, the available scientific works are not detailed enough to qualify the type of pain.…”

A systematic review of next-generation point-of-care stroke diagnostic technologies

“…Such a thorough understanding also greatly reduces the difficulty of obtaining FDA approval, allowing for a shortened timeline to market. Notable medical devices that accurately predicted stroke in our review included EEG-based diagnosis with a maximum sensitivity of 91.7% for predicting a stroke, 23 microwave-based diagnosis with an AUC of 0.88 for differentiating ischemic stroke and ICH, 11 ultrasound with an AUC of 0.92, 27 VIPS with an AUC of 0.93, 8 and portable MRI with a diagnostic accuracy similar to that of traditional MRI. 28,29 In addition, current technologies require further innovation to accurately classify stroke subtypes while achieving acceptable scanning depths and volume sensitivity.…”

“…The first study was published by Michelson et al in 2015 and demonstrated acute stroke diagnosis (ischemic and hemorrhagic) with high sensitivity (91.7%) and moderate specificity (50.4%). 23 Further experimentation by Gottlibe et al, Shreve et al, and Wilkinson et al confirmed the efficacy of EEG for ischemic stroke diagnosis using the changes in the revised brain symmetry index, alpha/delta frequency band ratios, and mixed delta/alpha ratio plus pairwise-derived brain symmetry index values, respectively. 10,13,24 These studies suggested that EEG may accurately predict acute stroke within 3 minutes.…”