2012
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a Western Blot Pattern for the Specific Diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi Infection in Human Sera

Abstract: Abstract. A Western blot (WB) method using a lysate from Trypanosoma cruzi (Maracay strain) epimastigotes was evaluated. Serum samples from 37 patients with confirmed Chagas disease (cohort I), 27 Spanish patients with visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania infantum (cohort II), and 28 Colombian patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. panamensis and negative serology for Chagas disease (cohort III) were tested. The negative controls were 55 healthy seronegative subjects for T. cruzi and Leishma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of a reference gold standard test to confirm the diagnosis, we performed a qualitative immunological method (in-house Western blot) as has been suggested for serological confirmation by other authors. 15,16 In the case of a positive result in this test, the individual was considered infected to offer to the newborn the best diagnostic option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of a reference gold standard test to confirm the diagnosis, we performed a qualitative immunological method (in-house Western blot) as has been suggested for serological confirmation by other authors. 15,16 In the case of a positive result in this test, the individual was considered infected to offer to the newborn the best diagnostic option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples with positive results for both assays were included in panel I, and sera with negative results were included in panel II. Samples with discordant results by these techniques were included in panel III, and they were tested by an in-house WB based on lysate T. cruzi epimastigotes, as described elsewhere (19). The final interpretation of panel III samples was based on results coinciding in two out of the three techniques performed; thus, 11 were considered negative and one was considered positive.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These samples had discordant results for ELISAc and ELISAr and were also tested by Western blotting (WB) (19) in order to get the final interpretation (11 considered negative and 1 positive). Clinical and epidemiological data were also considered for the selection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All discordant serum samples were tested by using an in-house Western blotting method with a lysate from Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes. 9 When a positive result was obtained, chest radiograph, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, esophagogram, and barium enema were performed and specific treatment was offered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%