2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-019-2200-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a transient state during the acquisition of temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma

Abstract: Drug resistance limits the therapeutic efficacy in cancers and leads to tumor recurrence through ill-defined mechanisms. Glioblastoma (GBM) are the deadliest brain tumors in adults. GBM, at diagnosis or after treatment, are resistant to temozolomide (TMZ), the standard chemotherapy. To better understand the acquisition of this resistance, we performed a longitudinal study, using a combination of mathematical models, RNA sequencing, single cell analyses, functional and drug assays in a human glioma cell line (U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
68
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The induction of persisters in glioma cells has been known to be partially reverted by ‘drug wash-out’ suggesting the contribution of epigenetic mechanisms in drug resistance and supporting the possibility of TMZ rechallenge in glioma patients after prior drug exposure [39], provided there is a sufficiently long waiting time between treatments. Recent experimental results support this hypothesis [40]. In our case, the fact that the maintenance phase of the treatment leaves a time spacing of three months within cycles could be optimal not only in terms of survival but also to avoid persisters becoming resistant tumor cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The induction of persisters in glioma cells has been known to be partially reverted by ‘drug wash-out’ suggesting the contribution of epigenetic mechanisms in drug resistance and supporting the possibility of TMZ rechallenge in glioma patients after prior drug exposure [39], provided there is a sufficiently long waiting time between treatments. Recent experimental results support this hypothesis [40]. In our case, the fact that the maintenance phase of the treatment leaves a time spacing of three months within cycles could be optimal not only in terms of survival but also to avoid persisters becoming resistant tumor cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Moreover, we assume that once sensitive cells have acquired a resistant phenotype they irreversibly remain in that state, and thus do not return to a sensitive state after any subsequent time elapsed. This assumption is in agreement with several works dealing with resistances in tumours (see for instance [38] and [41]).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…For each of the four biological replicates per condition, the library construction was performed from 500 ng of total RNA with SureSelect Strand-Specific RNA Library Prep for Illumina Multiplexed kit (#5190-6410, Agilent Technologies) according to manufacturer' protocol as previously described [50]. Purifications were carried out with NucleoMag NGS Clean-up and Size Select (#744970.50, Macherey-Nagel, Hoerdt, France).…”
Section: Library Construction and Rna-seq Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%