Identification of a Suitable Short‐form of the UCLA‐Loneliness Scale

Elphinstone, Brad

doi:10.1111/ap.12285

Cited by 34 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Higher scores indicate a higher level of loneliness. This scale was selected because: 1) it is the only Japanese loneliness scale with established reliability and validity; 2) the version is recent; and 3) the English version and scale for different cultures has been used internationally [37–41], and therefore, comparisons can be made (Additional files 1 and 2).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale version 3 (UCLA-LS3) [35], which is a revision of the original version of UCLA-LS [36] by Russell, has been adapted and validated in various subjects in numerous different countries, including Australia [37], Turkey [38], Northern Ireland [39], Iran [40], Italy [41], and Japan [42]. These adapted scales have great feasibility and applicability in their respective populations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The three items on the SF-3 were selected because they showed the highest loading on the first factor of a three-factor model [44]. A comparison study of the short-forms of the UCLA-LS [37] revealed that the SF-10 [35] and the SF-3 [44] are both reliable and valid. Therefore, the UCLA-LS3 as well as its two short-form versions (SF-10 and SF-3 have become some of the most widely used measures of loneliness worldwide.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the UCLA loneliness scale version 3 for use among mothers with infants and toddlers: a cross-sectional study

Arimoto

Tadaka

2019

BMC Women's Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Mothers with infants and toddlers are a potential target population for the prevention or alleviation of feelings of loneliness. However, the theory and methods for measuring loneliness among mothers with infants and toddlers have yet to be standardized worldwide, including in Japan. Our goal was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3 (UCLA-LS3-J), as well as two short-form versions—the 10-item UCLA-LS3 (SF-10) and the 3-item UCLA-LS3 (SF-3)—for the measurement of loneliness in mothers with infants and toddlers in Japan. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-report questionnaire. The target population was 430 mothers with infants and toddlers who visited a community health center in Yokohama City in Japan. Questionnaire items encompassed the UCLA-LS3-J, as well as demographic data, the feeling for childrearing scale, and measures of social networks and subjective health status. The reliability and validity of the UCLA-LS3-J and its two short-form versions (SF-3 and SF-10) were determined via IBM SPSS Amos and SPSS Statistics 22. Results Questionnaires were returned by 248 mothers (valid response rate: 57.7%) aged 32.7 ± 4.6 (mean ± SD) years. The mean score on the UCLA-LS3-J was 38.4 ± 9.7 (range 20.0–73.0), with a normal distribution. When confirmatory factor analysis was carried out (for a single factor model), the goodness of fit of the model was almost identical to that of the original UCLA-LS3 version for the UCLA-LS3-J: (GFI = 0.882, AGFI = 0.840, CFI = 0.932, RMSEA = 0.066) and SF-10: (GFI = 0.942, AGFI = 0.900, CFI = 0.956, RMSEA = 0.081). The SF-3 model also showed an acceptable fit. The UCLA-LS3-J total score was significantly correlated with the total score on the SF-10 (r = 0.965) and SF-3 (r = 0.868). The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the UCLA-LS3-J was 0.926, while those of the SF-10 and SF-3 were 0.888 and 0.790, respectively. The score on the UCLA-LS3-J was positively correlated with childcare burden (r = .319, p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with social networks (r = −.438, p < 0.001). Conclusions This study indicated that the reliability and validity of the UCLA-LS3-J as well as its two short-form versions were adequate for assessing loneliness in mothers with infants and toddlers in Japan. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12905-019-0792-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the UCLA loneliness scale version 3 for use among mothers with infants and toddlers: a cross-sectional study

Arimoto

Tadaka

2019

BMC Women's Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although there are fewer studies with young and middle aged adults, there is some evidence of a similar pattern of greater isolation being associated with negative psychological outcomes for this population (Bergin and Pakenham, 2015;Elphinstone, 2018;Liu et al, 2019;Nicholson, 2012;Smith and Lim, 2020;Usher et al, 2020). There is also considerable evidence that social isolation can have a detrimental impact on physical health (Holt-Lunstad et al, 2010;Steptoe et al, 2013).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of social isolation on well-being and life satisfaction during pandemic

Clair

Gordon

Kroon

et al. 2021

Humanit Soc Sci Commun

196

152

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic placed many locations under ‘stay at home” orders and adults simultaneously underwent a form of social isolation that is unprecedented in the modern world. Perceived social isolation can have a significant effect on health and well-being. Further, one can live with others and still experience perceived social isolation. However, there is limited research on psychological well-being during a pandemic. In addition, much of the research is limited to older adult samples. This study examined the effects of perceived social isolation in adults across the age span. Specifically, this study documented the prevalence of social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the various factors that contribute to individuals of all ages feeling more or less isolated while they are required to maintain physical distancing for an extended period of time. Survey data was collected from 309 adults who ranged in age from 18 to 84. The measure consisted of a 42 item survey from the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale, Measures of Social Isolation (Zavaleta et al., 2017), and items specifically about the pandemic and demographics. Items included both Likert scale items and open-ended questions. A “snowball” data collection process was used to build the sample. While the entire sample reported at least some perceived social isolation, young adults reported the highest levels of isolation, χ2(2) = 27.36, p < 0.001. Perceived social isolation was associated with poor life satisfaction across all domains, as well as work-related stress, and lower trust of institutions. Higher levels of substance use as a coping strategy was also related to higher perceived social isolation. Respondents reporting higher levels of subjective personal risk for COVID-19 also reported higher perceived social isolation. The experience of perceived social isolation has significant negative consequences related to psychological well-being.

show abstract

“…The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale in a reduced form is reported to have high reliability and validity [27,29]. The 10-item scale has been reported to have internal consistency and convergent validity similar to the 20 item scale, is shorter, and provides superior model fit [30]. Participants rated each item on a scale from 1 (never) to 4 (often) and were asked to respond to each item for both shift periods (i.e., rate feelings of loneliness for when the FIFO/DIDO workers were away and rate feelings of loneliness for when the FIFO/DIDO workers were at home).…”

Section: Lonelinessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing the Effects of FIFO/DIDO Workers Being Home versus Away on Sleep and Loneliness for Partners of Australian Mining Workers

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fly in Fly out/Drive in Drive out (FIFO/DIDO) is a prevalent work arrangement in the Australian mining industry and has been associated with adverse outcomes such as psychological stress, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and work/life interference. FIFO/DIDO work arrangements have the potential to not only impact the FIFO/DIDO worker, but also the partner of the FIFO/DIDO worker. However, there is sparse empirical evidence on the impact of FIFO/DIDO work arrangements on partners' sleep and subsequent performance. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to describe and compare partners' sleep quality, sleep duration, sleepiness, and loneliness when the FIFO/DIDO workers were at home (off-shift) and away (on-shift). A secondary aim of this study was to examine whether differences in partners' sleep quality and sleep duration as a result of FIFO/DIDO worker's absence could be partially explained through the presence of dependents in the home, relationship duration, chronotype, duration in a FIFO/DIDO role, and loneliness. Self-reported questionnaires were completed by 195 female and 4 male participants, mostly aged between 18 and 44 years and who had been in a relationship with a FIFO/DIDO mining worker for more than five years. Of note, most participants subjectively reported poor sleep quality, insufficient sleep duration, excessive sleepiness, and moderate to extreme loneliness compared to the general population regardless of whether the FIFO/DIDO workers were at home or away. Compared to when the FIFO/DIDO workers were at home, partners experienced reduced sleep quality and increased loneliness when the FIFO/DIDO workers were away. Secondary analyses revealed that loneliness may partially underpin the negative effect that FIFO/DIDO workers' absence has on sleep quality. Further research is needed to understand the factors that contribute to poor sleep quality, insufficient sleep duration, excessive sleepiness, and loneliness of FIFO/DIDO partners to inform appropriate strategies to support FIFO/DIDO partners' health and wellbeing not only in the mining population, but other industries that incorporate similar FIFO/DIDO work arrangements (e.g., emergency services, offshore drilling, and transport).Clocks&Sleep 2020, 2 87 12 h day and night shifts where workers reside on-site in temporary accommodation for the duration of their work period (between 1-4 weeks) and then return to their usual place of residency during their off-shift period [3,4].There are benefits for families in FIFO/DIDO working arrangements including high income and the ability to maintain an urban lifestyle with more facilities and services available without relocating the family to rural/remote locations [5]. Whilst the mining workforce has the highest median weekly earnings in the Australia working population, the roles come at a cost as they are often reported to be related to long, physically demanding shifts in isolated locations away from the workers' homes [6]. FIFO/DIDO work arrangements can interfere with home and family life in a numb...

show abstract

Identification of a Suitable Short‐form of the UCLA‐Loneliness Scale

Cited by 34 publications

References 42 publications

Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the UCLA loneliness scale version 3 for use among mothers with infants and toddlers: a cross-sectional study

Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the UCLA loneliness scale version 3 for use among mothers with infants and toddlers: a cross-sectional study

The effects of social isolation on well-being and life satisfaction during pandemic

Comparing the Effects of FIFO/DIDO Workers Being Home versus Away on Sleep and Loneliness for Partners of Australian Mining Workers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About