2019
DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2019.1659094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a prognostic immune signature for cervical cancer to predict survival and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Abstract: 2019) Identification of a prognostic immune signature for cervical cancer to predict survival and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, OncoImmunology, 8:12, e1659094, ABSTRACT Cervical cancer (CC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Limited studies have investigated whether immune-related genes (IRGs) or tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) could be indicators for CC prognoses. The aim of this study was to develop an improved prognostic signature for CC based on IRGs or TIME to predict su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
109
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(54 reference statements)
3
109
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our IRGS include stratification methods such as novel markers, specific signaling pathways and immune infiltration. Similarly, an 11-IRGs for predicting the survival of cervical cancer patients and their response to immune checkpoint inhibitors was established [36]. The infiltration of CD8 T cells, memory-activated CD4 T cells and regulatory T cells were upregulated in the low immune group, while memory resting CD4 T cells were downregulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our IRGS include stratification methods such as novel markers, specific signaling pathways and immune infiltration. Similarly, an 11-IRGs for predicting the survival of cervical cancer patients and their response to immune checkpoint inhibitors was established [36]. The infiltration of CD8 T cells, memory-activated CD4 T cells and regulatory T cells were upregulated in the low immune group, while memory resting CD4 T cells were downregulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study revealed that cancer could be classified into “immune‐desert,” “innate immune‐inactivated” and “immune‐inflamed” clusters 7 . However, many studies have mainly focused on molecular‐level markers of cancer cells, such as mRNA panels and protein signatures 8‐10 . However, not only malignant cells in the tumor core but also stromal infiltrating immune cells play a crucial role in tumor proliferation, invasion and metastasis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autophagy-, EMT-, and immune-related gene signatures have been extensively reported in cancer [9,10,28]. However, few studies have analyzed CSC expression profiles to construct a risk prediction model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This ensured the construction of a more precise signature than that generated using a single dataset. Moreover, TCGA-PAAD cohort comprised roughly [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] non-PDAC samples, such as neuroendocrine neoplasms and intraductal papillary neoplasm. However, these uncommon pancreatic malignancies displayed completely different molecular profiles and clinical outcomes from those of the classical PDAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%