2014
DOI: 10.1111/hae.12536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a novel large deletion in a patient with severe factor V deficiency using an in‐house F5 MLPA assay

Abstract: Factor V (FV) deficiency is a rare autosomal recessive bleeding disorder caused by mutations in the F5 gene. FV-deficient patients in whom no mutation or only one mutation is found may harbour large gene rearrangements, which are not detected by conventional mutation screening strategies. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay for the detection of large deletions and duplications in the F5 gene. Twenty-two MLPA probes targeting 19 of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with plasma FV levels in the 0–5% range are expected to be homozygous or compound heterozygous for F5 mutations, but 10–20% of cases remain genetically unexplained . Failure to identify one or both mutations by direct sequencing of the coding region may signify the presence of gross gene rearrangements or deep‐intronic splicing mutations , which are not detected by conventional mutation screening strategies. Alternatively, it may be due to misclassification of exonic variants, which are typically assessed only on the basis of their predicted effects on translation, whereas they may just as well impair pre‐mRNA splicing, as recently shown for missense mutations in the FGB and F11 genes as well as for a synonymous mutation in the LMAN1 gene .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with plasma FV levels in the 0–5% range are expected to be homozygous or compound heterozygous for F5 mutations, but 10–20% of cases remain genetically unexplained . Failure to identify one or both mutations by direct sequencing of the coding region may signify the presence of gross gene rearrangements or deep‐intronic splicing mutations , which are not detected by conventional mutation screening strategies. Alternatively, it may be due to misclassification of exonic variants, which are typically assessed only on the basis of their predicted effects on translation, whereas they may just as well impair pre‐mRNA splicing, as recently shown for missense mutations in the FGB and F11 genes as well as for a synonymous mutation in the LMAN1 gene .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present case, we performed chip-based digital PCR to confirm the NPHP1 deletion. This new PCR technique allows absolute quantification of copy numbers without reference to a standard curve, and produces precise results compared with conventional real-time quantitative PCR [18, 19]. We show that digital PCR is an alternative efficient method to confirm clinical relevant CNVs in genetic diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic DNA isolated from HepG2 cells was standardized to 20 ng/µL and the MLPA reaction was performed following the manufacturer's protocol. FAM-labelled MLPA amplification products were mixed with GeneScan TM 600 LIZ ® dye Size Standard and Hi-Di TM formamide (Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, The Netherlands), denatured and separated by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Life Technologies), as previously described [35]. The results were analysed using Coffalyser.Net (MRC Holland).…”
Section: Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (Mlpa)mentioning
confidence: 99%