2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a novel, CF-causing compound genotype (p.S1159P and p.Y569H) using an NGS-based assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 38-year-old man with CF diagnosed by sweat testing with a typical clinical course and inconclusive CFTR genotyping became increasingly concerned about his health due to a declining lung function despite strong compliance with self-administered CF therapies. Inspired by the emergence of CFTR mutation-specific pharmacotherapy and the availability of improved genetic testing, this extremely motivated patient sought CFTR gene sequencing analysis, which identified a rare, poorly characterised mutation Ser1159Pro (c.3475T>C) [7] and the common class II mutation Phe508del (c.1521_1523delCTT). He conducted his own personal investigation among the CF patient community and then initiated the further consideration of evaluation and treatment options within his own care team.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 38-year-old man with CF diagnosed by sweat testing with a typical clinical course and inconclusive CFTR genotyping became increasingly concerned about his health due to a declining lung function despite strong compliance with self-administered CF therapies. Inspired by the emergence of CFTR mutation-specific pharmacotherapy and the availability of improved genetic testing, this extremely motivated patient sought CFTR gene sequencing analysis, which identified a rare, poorly characterised mutation Ser1159Pro (c.3475T>C) [7] and the common class II mutation Phe508del (c.1521_1523delCTT). He conducted his own personal investigation among the CF patient community and then initiated the further consideration of evaluation and treatment options within his own care team.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results for base calls from the NGS workflow were compared with the results of Sanger sequencing in other studies 2 , 3 , 8 , 18 , 19 . We randomly selected 25 of the 103 patients during the initial discovery stage of variants in silico (Table 3 , Supplementary Table S3 ) to optimize our informatics approach for discovering clinically important variants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%