2001
DOI: 10.1007/s003480000179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a new source of peak locking, analysis and its removal in conventional and super-resolution PIV techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that an additional error in the velocity estimation is present due to truncated particle images. The use of weighting functions and the removal of these truncated particle images can decrease this error significantly as shown by Nogueira et al (2001) and Liao and Cowen (2005). However, reducing the interrogation window size, only few and most likely truncated particle images are present, and thus, these techniques do not improve the results any further.…”
Section: Particle Tracking Velocimetry: Resolution Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that an additional error in the velocity estimation is present due to truncated particle images. The use of weighting functions and the removal of these truncated particle images can decrease this error significantly as shown by Nogueira et al (2001) and Liao and Cowen (2005). However, reducing the interrogation window size, only few and most likely truncated particle images are present, and thus, these techniques do not improve the results any further.…”
Section: Particle Tracking Velocimetry: Resolution Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Windowing functions, which become zero at the interrogation area boundaries (Gui et al 2000;Liao and Cowen 2005), reducing the effect of particle image truncation at the edges of the image sub-spaces (interrogation areas) to be correlated (Nogueira et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Direct correlation with a normalization, which so far has been realized in three ways: asymmetrically, with a small interrogation area from the first image correlated with a larger area in the second image (Huang et al 1993a;Fincham and Spedding 1997;Huang et al 1997;Rohály et al 2002), symmetrically, with two interrogation areas of the same size (Nogueira et al 1999;Nobach et al 2004) or bi-directional, combining an asymmetric direct correlation as above and a second direct correlation with a small interrogation area from the second image correlated with a larger area in the first image (Nogueira et al 2001), originally introduced as a ''symmetric'' method, but nonetheless using image sub-spaces of different sizes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many publications dealing with PIV subpixel interpolation, a so-called ''peak-locking'' effect is discussed, which is the tendency of peak position estimates to cluster around integer values (Keane and Adrian 1992;Westerweel 1998;Fincham and Delerce 2000;Forliti et al 2000;Nogueira et al 2001;Gui and Wereley 2002;Scarano (2002). The empirical finding is that a Gaussian peak fit performs better than linear or quadratic interpolation (see e.g.…”
Section: Peak Locking Interpreted As Interpolation Errormentioning
confidence: 91%