2020
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a Five-Gene Signature for Predicting Survival in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients

Abstract: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), predominantly caused by asbestos exposure, is a highly aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. The staging systems currently used in clinics is inadequate in evaluating the prognosis of MPM. In this study, a five-gene signature was developed and enrolled into a prognostic risk score model by LASSO Cox regression analysis based on two expression profiling datasets (GSE2549 and GSE51024) from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The five-gene signature was further validated using t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies proposed gene expression-based prognostic models in MPM [3,8,9,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. They differ significantly in their approaches for feature selection, training and validation datasets, the number of genes included in the final model, as well as in the performance in different MPM cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies proposed gene expression-based prognostic models in MPM [3,8,9,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. They differ significantly in their approaches for feature selection, training and validation datasets, the number of genes included in the final model, as well as in the performance in different MPM cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent and recent works pointed out changes affecting p53/DNA repair and PIK3CA pathways as being associated with reduced overall survival [ 57 , 58 ], demonstrating an overall poorly mutated landscape with high levels of tumor mutational burden (TMB) in only 5% of cases [ 59 ]. Different genetic signatures (including CDH2, CKS2, KIF11, KIF88, Lox, NF2, TP53, SETD2, LATS2, SETDB1, PBRM1, LATS1, SETD5) have been more recently proposed as independent prognostic tools in MPM [ 60 , 61 ]. Very recently, Zhang and coll.…”
Section: Genetic Alterations and Disease Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "pheatmap" R package was used to analyze the relationship between the molecular characteristics of MPM patients and other clinical variables in the high-risk and low-risk groups, and the "rms" (19) R package based on the multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to construct the nomogram based on independent prognostic factors, including risk score and M stage. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by using the ROC curve, and the predictive accuracy of the signature we constructed was evaluated by comparing it with the signature built by previous research (20,21).…”
Section: Validation Of the Independence Of The Prognostic Signature A...mentioning
confidence: 99%